FDCFF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
8.95M
GSM
Price
$4.28
Change
+$0.10 (+2.39%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
798.76M
73 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FDCFF vs GSM

Header iconFDCFF vs GSM Comparison
Open Charts FDCFF vs GSMBanner chart's image
Forum Energy Metals
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$57.78K
Capitalization8.95M
Ferroglobe
Price$4.28
Change+$0.10 (+2.39%)
Volume$674K
Capitalization798.76M
FDCFF vs GSM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FDCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDCFF vs. GSM commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCFF is a Hold and GSM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FDCFF: $0.03 vs. GSM: $4.28)
Brand notoriety: FDCFF and GSM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDCFF: 65% vs. GSM: 51%
Market capitalization -- FDCFF: $8.95M vs. GSM: $798.76M
FDCFF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $8.95M. GSM’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $798.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDCFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGSM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FDCFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GSM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GSM is a better buy in the long-term than FDCFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDCFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDCFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GSM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GSM is a better buy in the short-term than FDCFF.

Price Growth

FDCFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.14% price change this week, while GSM (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +2.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

GSM is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GSM($799M) has a higher market cap than FDCFF($8.95M). GSM YTD gains are higher at: 13.421 vs. FDCFF (-32.317). GSM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 262M vs. FDCFF (-12.66M). GSM has more cash in the bank: 148M vs. FDCFF (621K). GSM has higher revenues than FDCFF: GSM (1.4B) vs FDCFF (0).
FDCFFGSMFDCFF / GSM
Capitalization8.95M799M1%
EBITDA-12.66M262M-5%
Gain YTD-32.31713.421-241%
P/E RatioN/A6.03-
Revenue01.4B-
Total Cash621K148M0%
Total DebtN/A220M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDCFF vs GSM: Fundamental Ratings
FDCFF
GSM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2412
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10061
SMR RATING
1..100
10047
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6555
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10096
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSM's Valuation (16) in the Industrial Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for FDCFF (83) in the null industry. This means that GSM’s stock grew significantly faster than FDCFF’s over the last 12 months.

GSM's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDCFF (100) in the null industry. This means that GSM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDCFF’s over the last 12 months.

GSM's SMR Rating (47) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDCFF (100) in the null industry. This means that GSM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDCFF’s over the last 12 months.

GSM's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as FDCFF (65) in the null industry. This means that GSM’s stock grew similarly to FDCFF’s over the last 12 months.

GSM's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as FDCFF (100) in the null industry. This means that GSM’s stock grew similarly to FDCFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDCFFGSM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FDCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GSM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WWLAX14.29N/A
N/A
Westwood Quality Value Fund A
JIEMX20.08N/A
N/A
JHancock Equity Income 1
BIOPX51.95N/A
N/A
Baron Opportunity Retail
HEQCX5.88N/A
N/A
Monteagle Opportunity Equity Instl
MRGJX56.15-0.04
-0.07%
MFS Core Equity R4

FDCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FDCFF and LTSRF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FDCFF and LTSRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDCFF
1D Price
Change %
FDCFF100%
N/A
LTSRF - FDCFF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
GSM - FDCFF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.39%
PRMNF - FDCFF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.57%
AAGFF - FDCFF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
BATXF - FDCFF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More