Ad is loading...
FDCGX vs FDTGX
FDCGX vs FDTGX Comparison
Open Charts FDCGX vs FDTGX
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Staples C
Price$86.43
Change-$0.57 (-0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Staples M
Price$88.41
Change-$0.58 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.27B
FDCGX vs FDTGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDCGX vs. FDTGX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCGX is a StrongBuy and FDTGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDCGX (1.27B) and FDTGX (1.27B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FDTGX pays higher dividends than FDCGX: FDTGX (1.56) vs FDCGX (1.03). FDCGX was incepted earlier than FDTGX: FDCGX (18 years) vs FDTGX (18 years). FDCGX (1.72) is less costly to investors than FDTGX (1.23). FDCGX (54.00) and FDTGX (54.00) have comparable annual turnover. FDCGX (0) and FDTGX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FDCGX (500) and FDTGX (500) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. FDTGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.46 vs. FDCGX (-1.08). FDTGX return over 5 years is better than : 23.79 vs. FDCGX (20.41).
| FDCGX | FDTGX | FDCGX / FDTGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.23 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.23 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.981 | 2.076 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 500 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 1.27B | 1.27B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.56 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.08 | -0.46 | 236% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.63 | 6.42 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.41 | 23.79 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.40 | -2.20 | 245% |