FDCHF
Price
$1.53
Change
-$0.04 (-2.55%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
225.69M
HYPOF
Price
$214.69
Change
-$10.30 (-4.58%)
Updated
Mar 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.26B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FDCHF vs HYPOF

Header iconFDCHF vs HYPOF Comparison
Open Charts FDCHF vs HYPOFBanner chart's image
Funding Circle
Price$1.53
Change-$0.04 (-2.55%)
Volume$23.08K
Capitalization225.69M
Hypoport AG
Price$214.69
Change-$10.30 (-4.58%)
Volume$5
Capitalization1.26B
FDCHF vs HYPOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDCHF vs. HYPOF commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCHF is a Hold and HYPOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FDCHF: $1.53 vs. HYPOF: $214.70)
Brand notoriety: FDCHF and HYPOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDCHF: 248% vs. HYPOF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FDCHF: $225.69M vs. HYPOF: $1.26B
FDCHF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $225.69M. HYPOF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $1.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDCHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHYPOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FDCHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HYPOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FDCHF is a better buy in the long-term than HYPOF.

Price Growth

FDCHF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -2.55% price change this week, while HYPOF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.10%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.32% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HYPOF($1.26B) has a higher market cap than FDCHF($226M). HYPOF has higher P/E ratio than FDCHF: HYPOF (108.70) vs FDCHF (6.84). FDCHF YTD gains are higher at: -2.548 vs. HYPOF (-29.552). FDCHF (43.8M) and HYPOF (42.7M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . FDCHF has more cash in the bank: 183M vs. HYPOF (83.1M). FDCHF has less debt than HYPOF: FDCHF (114M) vs HYPOF (192M). HYPOF has higher revenues than FDCHF: HYPOF (413M) vs FDCHF (172M).
FDCHFHYPOFFDCHF / HYPOF
Capitalization226M1.26B18%
EBITDA43.8M42.7M103%
Gain YTD-2.548-29.5529%
P/E Ratio6.84108.706%
Revenue172M413M42%
Total Cash183M83.1M220%
Total Debt114M192M59%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDCHF vs HYPOF: Fundamental Ratings
FDCHF
HYPOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9440
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
53100
SMR RATING
1..100
6071
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4956
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
122
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HYPOF's Valuation (95) in the null industry is in the same range as FDCHF (96). This means that HYPOF’s stock grew similarly to FDCHF’s over the last 12 months.

FDCHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HYPOF (100). This means that FDCHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than HYPOF’s over the last 12 months.

FDCHF's SMR Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as HYPOF (71). This means that FDCHF’s stock grew similarly to HYPOF’s over the last 12 months.

FDCHF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as HYPOF (56). This means that FDCHF’s stock grew similarly to HYPOF’s over the last 12 months.

FDCHF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as HYPOF (22). This means that FDCHF’s stock grew similarly to HYPOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OAZEX21.670.01
+0.05%
Oakmark International Small Cap R6
GGDPX15.04N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Intl Sm Cp Insghts P
TGVYX54.23N/A
N/A
Touchstone Dynamic Large Cap Growth Y
FGIYX12.64N/A
N/A
Nuveen Global Infrastructure I
UIVIX12.29N/A
N/A
MFS Intrinsic Value I

FDCHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCHF has been loosely correlated with CSASF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDCHF jumps, then CSASF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDCHF
1D Price
Change %
FDCHF100%
N/A
CSASF - FDCHF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BCVVF - FDCHF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LZRFY - FDCHF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.02%
FNMA - FDCHF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
KGTHY - FDCHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

HYPOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HYPOF and FMCC have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HYPOF and FMCC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HYPOF
1D Price
Change %
HYPOF100%
N/A
FMCC - HYPOF
9%
Poorly correlated
+4.17%
FNMA - HYPOF
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
MAURY - HYPOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
FNLIF - HYPOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FDCHF - HYPOF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More