FDCHF
Price
$1.57
Change
-$0.05 (-3.09%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
HYPOF
Price
$304.76
Change
+$155.03 (+103.54%)
Updated
Oct 21 closing price
Ad is loading...

FDCHF vs HYPOF

Header iconFDCHF vs HYPOF Comparison
Open Charts FDCHF vs HYPOFBanner chart's image
Funding Circle
Price$1.57
Change-$0.05 (-3.09%)
Volume$8.34K
CapitalizationN/A
Hypoport AG
Price$304.76
Change+$155.03 (+103.54%)
Volume$2
CapitalizationN/A
FDCHF vs HYPOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FDCHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HYPOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDCHF vs. HYPOF commentary
Dec 24, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCHF is a Hold and HYPOF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 24, 2024
Stock price -- (FDCHF: $1.57 vs. HYPOF: $304.76)
Brand notoriety: FDCHF and HYPOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDCHF: 185% vs. HYPOF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FDCHF: $225.69M vs. HYPOF: $1.26B
FDCHF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $225.69M. HYPOF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $1.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDCHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHYPOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FDCHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HYPOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FDCHF is a better buy in the long-term than HYPOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDCHF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HYPOF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDCHF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • HYPOF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HYPOF is a better buy in the short-term than FDCHF.

Price Growth

FDCHF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HYPOF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.78% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HYPOF($1.26B) has a higher market cap than FDCHF($226M). HYPOF has higher P/E ratio than FDCHF: HYPOF (108.70) vs FDCHF (6.84). FDCHF YTD gains are higher at: 230.735 vs. HYPOF (103.537). FDCHF (43.8M) and HYPOF (42.7M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . FDCHF has more cash in the bank: 183M vs. HYPOF (83.1M). FDCHF has less debt than HYPOF: FDCHF (114M) vs HYPOF (192M). HYPOF has higher revenues than FDCHF: HYPOF (413M) vs FDCHF (172M).
FDCHFHYPOFFDCHF / HYPOF
Capitalization226M1.26B18%
EBITDA43.8M42.7M103%
Gain YTD230.735103.537223%
P/E Ratio6.84108.706%
Revenue172M413M42%
Total Cash183M83.1M220%
Total Debt114M192M59%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDCHF: Fundamental Ratings
FDCHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
27
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80
SMR RATING
1..100
61
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
53
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDCHFHYPOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
14%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
16%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FDCHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HYPOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JFNCX57.830.59
+1.03%
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences C
PRIGX17.100.10
+0.59%
T. Rowe Price Glbl Val Eq Cl I
BGHDX5.73N/A
N/A
Baillie Gifford Health Inn Eq K
DNLRX60.31-0.06
-0.10%
BNY Mellon Active MidCap I
VRTGX403.07-1.55
-0.38%
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index I

FDCHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCHF has been loosely correlated with CSASF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDCHF jumps, then CSASF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDCHF
1D Price
Change %
FDCHF100%
N/A
CSASF - FDCHF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BCVVF - FDCHF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BEBE - FDCHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.67%
LZRFY - FDCHF
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
FNMA - FDCHF
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.60%
More

HYPOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HYPOF and FMCC have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HYPOF and FMCC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HYPOF
1D Price
Change %
HYPOF100%
N/A
FMCC - HYPOF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.88%
FNMA - HYPOF
7%
Poorly correlated
-2.60%
MAURY - HYPOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-7.41%
FNLIF - HYPOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FDCHF - HYPOF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More