Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDESX vs RGAHX
FDESX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts FDESX vs RGAHX
FDESX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDESX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDESX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FDESX (4.27B). FDESX pays higher dividends than RGAHX: FDESX (0.45) vs RGAHX (0.40). FDESX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: FDESX (56 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). RGAHX (0.44) is less costly to investors than FDESX (0.41). FDESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). FDESX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAHX: FDESX (0) vs RGAHX (250). FDESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.85 vs. RGAHX (1.76). FDESX return over 5 years is better than : 17.05 vs. RGAHX (14.70).
| FDESX | RGAHX | FDESX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.44 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 0.44 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 56 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.430 | 5.452 | 210% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.27B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.40 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.85 | 1.76 | 786% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.49 | 37.92 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.05 | 14.70 | 116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.89 | 99.12 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement