Ad is loading...
FDEV vs IEFA
FDEV vs IEFA Comparison
Open Charts FDEV vs IEFA
Fidelity International Multifactor ETF
Price$31.00
Change+$0.08 (+0.26%)
Volume$350
Net Assets142.97M
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
Price$79.83
Change+$0.34 (+0.43%)
Volume$32.33K
Net Assets134.55B
FDEV vs IEFA Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDEV vs. IEFA commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDEV is a Buy and IEFA is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IEFA has more net assets: 135B vs. FDEV (143M). FDEV has a higher annual dividend yield than IEFA: FDEV (13.821) vs IEFA (13.091). FDEV was incepted earlier than IEFA: FDEV (6 years) vs IEFA (13 years). IEFA (0.07) has a lower expense ratio than FDEV (0.18). FDEV has a higher turnover IEFA (2.00) vs IEFA (2.00).
| FDEV | IEFA | FDEV / IEFA | |
| Gain YTD | 13.821 | 13.091 | 106% |
| Net Assets | 143M | 135B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.18 | 0.07 | 257% |
| Turnover | 55.00 | 2.00 | 2,750% |
| Yield | 2.73 | 3.10 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 13 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDEV | IEFA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 5 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDEV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDEV has been loosely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDEV jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDEV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDEV | 100% | -0.81% | ||
| NWG - FDEV | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.80% | ||
| BAM - FDEV | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.90% | ||
| TRI - FDEV | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| MFC - FDEV | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| SAN - FDEV | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.37% | ||
More | ||||
IEFA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IEFA has been loosely correlated with ASML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IEFA jumps, then ASML could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IEFA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEFA | 100% | -0.30% | ||
| ASML - IEFA | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| SAP - IEFA | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| SHEL - IEFA | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| ROG - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.80% | ||
| MC - IEFA | 45% Loosely correlated | +4.12% | ||
More | ||||