The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
| FDFF | |
| Gain YTD | -1.576 |
| Net Assets | 48.7M |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 |
| Turnover | 22.00 |
| Yield | 0.79 |
| Fund Existence | 6 years |
| FDFF | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDFF has been closely correlated with APO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDFF jumps, then APO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDFF | 100% | +1.06% | ||
| APO - FDFF | 81% Closely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| ARES - FDFF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| BLK - FDFF | 75% Closely correlated | +1.03% | ||
| MA - FDFF | 75% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| OWL - FDFF | 75% Closely correlated | +2.27% | ||
More | ||||