Ad is loading...
FDG vs SCHG
FDG vs SCHG Comparison
Open Charts FDG vs SCHG
American Century Foc Dynmc Gr ETF
Price$86.34
Change-$0.09 (-0.10%)
Volume$6.77K
Net Assets232.22M
Schwab US Large-Cap Growth ETF™
Price$23.69
Change-$0.12 (-0.50%)
Volume$9.72M
Net Assets33.6B
FDG vs SCHG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDG vs. SCHG commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDG is a Hold and SCHG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHG has more net assets: 33.6B vs. FDG (232M). SCHG has a higher annual dividend yield than FDG: SCHG (-14.911) vs FDG (-16.869). FDG was incepted earlier than SCHG: FDG (5 years) vs SCHG (15 years). SCHG (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than FDG (0.45). FDG has a higher turnover SCHG (3.00) vs SCHG (3.00).
| FDG | SCHG | FDG / SCHG | |
| Gain YTD | -16.869 | -14.911 | 113% |
| Net Assets | 232M | 33.6B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.45 | 0.04 | 1,125% |
| Turnover | 45.00 | 3.00 | 1,500% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDG | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDG has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDG jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDG | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| CDNS - FDG | 73% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| ARM - FDG | 72% Closely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| MPWR - FDG | 66% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| AMZN - FDG | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| ON - FDG | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.14% | ||
More | ||||
SCHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHG has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SCHG jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | 100% | -0.50% | ||
| CDNS - SCHG | 78% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| SNPS - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | -0.56% | ||
| MSFT - SCHG | 77% Closely correlated | -1.03% | ||
| LRCX - SCHG | 76% Closely correlated | -2.12% | ||
| META - SCHG | 75% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More | ||||