Ad is loading...
FDGLX vs RBETX
FDGLX vs RBETX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDGLX vs. RBETX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDGLX is a Hold and RBETX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBETX has more cash in the bank: 48.6B vs. FDGLX (2.82B). FDGLX pays higher dividends than RBETX: FDGLX (2.46) vs RBETX (1.33). FDGLX was incepted earlier than RBETX: FDGLX (8 years) vs RBETX (18 years). RBETX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FDGLX (0.37). FDGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. RBETX (7.00). FDGLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBETX: FDGLX (0) vs RBETX (250). FDGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.10 vs. RBETX (6.12). FDGLX return over 5 years is better than : 27.73 vs. RBETX (25.84).
| FDGLX | RBETX | FDGLX / RBETX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 1.42 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 1.42 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.088 | 1.790 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.82B | 48.6B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.46 | 1.33 | 185% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.10 | 6.12 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.61 | 17.55 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.73 | 25.84 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 35.93 | - |