Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDGLX vs RBETX
FDGLX vs RBETX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDGLX vs. RBETX commentary
Jun 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDGLX is a Hold and RBETX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBETX has more cash in the bank: 49.6B vs. FDGLX (2.91B). FDGLX pays higher dividends than RBETX: FDGLX (2.42) vs RBETX (1.29). FDGLX was incepted earlier than RBETX: FDGLX (8 years) vs RBETX (18 years). RBETX (1.42) is less costly to investors than FDGLX (0.37). FDGLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. RBETX (7.00). FDGLX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBETX: FDGLX (0) vs RBETX (250). RBETX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.80 vs. FDGLX (5.60). RBETX return over 5 years is better than : 25.18 vs. FDGLX (22.36).
| FDGLX | RBETX | FDGLX / RBETX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 1.42 | 26% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.37 | 1.42 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.011 | 4.356 | 46% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.91B | 49.6B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.42 | 1.29 | 188% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.60 | 8.80 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.53 | 16.24 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.36 | 25.18 | 89% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 39.25 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement