Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDM vs SQLV
FDM vs SQLV Comparison
Open Charts FDM vs SQLV
First Trust Dow Jones Sel MicroCap ETF
Price$65.59
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets178.04M
Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF
Price$37.99
Change-$0.23 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.52M
FDM vs SQLV Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDM vs. SQLV commentary
May 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDM is a Buy and SQLV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDM has more net assets: 178M vs. SQLV (25.5M). FDM has a higher annual dividend yield than SQLV: FDM (-3.345) vs SQLV (-9.779). FDM was incepted earlier than SQLV: FDM (20 years) vs SQLV (8 years). FDM (0.60) and SQLV (0.60) have comparable expense ratios . SQLV has a higher turnover FDM (71.00) vs FDM (71.00).
| FDM | SQLV | FDM / SQLV | |
| Gain YTD | -3.345 | -9.779 | 34% |
| Net Assets | 178M | 25.5M | 698% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.60 | 100% |
| Turnover | 71.00 | 101.00 | 70% |
| Yield | 2.09 | 1.35 | 155% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDM | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDM has been closely correlated with BFST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDM jumps, then BFST could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDM | 100% | -1.92% | ||
| BFST - FDM | 81% Closely correlated | -2.79% | ||
| BCML - FDM | 78% Closely correlated | -1.49% | ||
| ASTE - FDM | 77% Closely correlated | -3.49% | ||
| FSBC - FDM | 77% Closely correlated | -2.94% | ||
| SPFI - FDM | 76% Closely correlated | -2.75% | ||
More | ||||
SQLV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQLV has been closely correlated with WTFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SQLV jumps, then WTFC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SQLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQLV | 100% | -2.61% | ||
| WTFC - SQLV | 83% Closely correlated | -3.19% | ||
| IBOC - SQLV | 81% Closely correlated | -2.73% | ||
| WSFS - SQLV | 79% Closely correlated | -3.05% | ||
| ABCB - SQLV | 79% Closely correlated | -1.94% | ||
| AX - SQLV | 79% Closely correlated | -3.57% | ||
More | ||||