Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDM vs SQLV
FDM vs SQLV Comparison
Open Charts FDM vs SQLV
First Trust Dow Jones Sel MicroCap ETF
Price$68.24
Change-$1.51 (-2.16%)
Volume$4.47K
Net Assets181.67M
Royce Quant Small-Cap Quality Value ETF
Price$39.78
Change-$0.14 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.31M
FDM vs SQLV Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDM vs. SQLV commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDM is a StrongBuy and SQLV is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDM has more net assets: 182M vs. SQLV (25.3M). FDM has a higher annual dividend yield than SQLV: FDM (0.555) vs SQLV (-5.762). FDM was incepted earlier than SQLV: FDM (20 years) vs SQLV (8 years). FDM (0.60) and SQLV (0.60) have comparable expense ratios . SQLV has a higher turnover FDM (71.00) vs FDM (71.00).
| FDM | SQLV | FDM / SQLV | |
| Gain YTD | 0.555 | -5.762 | -10% |
| Net Assets | 182M | 25.3M | 719% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.60 | 100% |
| Turnover | 71.00 | 101.00 | 70% |
| Yield | 1.91 | 1.27 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDM | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDM has been closely correlated with BFST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDM jumps, then BFST could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDM | 100% | -2.16% | ||
| BFST - FDM | 82% Closely correlated | -3.03% | ||
| BCML - FDM | 78% Closely correlated | -2.48% | ||
| ASTE - FDM | 78% Closely correlated | -2.65% | ||
| FSBC - FDM | 77% Closely correlated | -3.49% | ||
| SPFI - FDM | 77% Closely correlated | -2.58% | ||
More | ||||
SQLV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQLV has been closely correlated with WTFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SQLV jumps, then WTFC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SQLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SQLV | 100% | N/A | ||
| WTFC - SQLV | 83% Closely correlated | -1.76% | ||
| IBOC - SQLV | 81% Closely correlated | -2.94% | ||
| WSFS - SQLV | 79% Closely correlated | -2.58% | ||
| AX - SQLV | 79% Closely correlated | -3.50% | ||
| ABCB - SQLV | 79% Closely correlated | -2.61% | ||
More | ||||