Ad is loading...
FDSSX vs GFAFX
FDSSX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FDSSX vs GFAFX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$68.18
Change+$6.48 (+10.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets245.76B
FDSSX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDSSX vs. GFAFX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDSSX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 246B vs. FDSSX (6.66B). FDSSX pays higher dividends than GFAFX: FDSSX (0.88) vs GFAFX (0.35). FDSSX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FDSSX (35 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). GFAFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FDSSX (0.44). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FDSSX (3.00). FDSSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFAFX: FDSSX (0) vs GFAFX (250). FDSSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.47 vs. GFAFX (-12.13). FDSSX return over 5 years is better than : 64.46 vs. GFAFX (36.47).
| FDSSX | GFAFX | FDSSX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.67 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.44 | 0.67 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -16.783 | -16.350 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.66B | 246B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 0.35 | 249% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.47 | -12.13 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.99 | -3.17 | -126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.46 | 36.47 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.40 | 39.06 | 208% |