Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTGX vs PGLOX
FDTGX vs PGLOX Comparison
Open Charts FDTGX vs PGLOX
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Staples M
Price$80.06
Change-$0.92 (-1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.08B
T. Rowe Price Global Consumer
Price$18.34
Change-$0.04 (-0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets31.32M
FDTGX vs PGLOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTGX vs. PGLOX commentary
Oct 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTGX is a Buy and PGLOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDTGX has more cash in the bank: 1.08B vs. PGLOX (31.3M). FDTGX pays higher dividends than PGLOX: FDTGX (1.47) vs PGLOX (0.17). FDTGX was incepted earlier than PGLOX: FDTGX (19 years) vs PGLOX (9 years). PGLOX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FDTGX (1.22). FDTGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. PGLOX (18.90). FDTGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGLOX: FDTGX (0) vs PGLOX (2500). PGLOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.06 vs. FDTGX (-15.11). PGLOX return over 5 years is better than : 12.37 vs. FDTGX (-2.45).
| FDTGX | PGLOX | FDTGX / PGLOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.05 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.68 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.206 | 5.450 | -132% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 31.3M | 3,435% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.47 | 0.17 | 873% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.11 | 6.06 | -249% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.04 | 48.42 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.45 | 12.37 | -20% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.51 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement