Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTGX vs PGLOX
FDTGX vs PGLOX Comparison
Open Charts FDTGX vs PGLOX
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Staples M
Price$81.32
Change-$0.41 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.05B
T. Rowe Price Global Consumer
Price$18.63
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.21M
FDTGX vs PGLOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTGX vs. PGLOX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTGX is a Hold and PGLOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDTGX has more cash in the bank: 1.05B vs. PGLOX (25.2M). FDTGX pays higher dividends than PGLOX: FDTGX (1.43) vs PGLOX (0.17). FDTGX was incepted earlier than PGLOX: FDTGX (19 years) vs PGLOX (9 years). PGLOX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FDTGX (1.22). FDTGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.00 vs. PGLOX (18.90). FDTGX has a lower initial minimum investment than PGLOX: FDTGX (0) vs PGLOX (2500). PGLOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.37 vs. FDTGX (-12.12). PGLOX return over 5 years is better than : 10.08 vs. FDTGX (-3.60).
| FDTGX | PGLOX | FDTGX / PGLOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.05 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.68 | 73% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.745 | 6.885 | -83% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.05B | 25.2M | 4,175% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 0.17 | 865% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.12 | 8.37 | -145% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.96 | 41.56 | -17% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.60 | 10.08 | -36% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement