Ad is loading...
FDTGX vs RYCIX
FDTGX vs RYCIX Comparison
Open Charts FDTGX vs RYCIX
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Staples M
Price$84.66
Change+$0.07 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.25B
Rydex Consumer Products I
Price$150.09
Change-$0.39 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.27M
FDTGX vs RYCIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTGX vs. RYCIX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTGX is a Buy and RYCIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDTGX has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. RYCIX (39.3M). RYCIX pays higher dividends than FDTGX: RYCIX (1.53) vs FDTGX (1.43). FDTGX was incepted earlier than RYCIX: FDTGX (18 years) vs RYCIX (27 years). RYCIX (1.43) is less costly to investors than FDTGX (1.22). FDTGX (45.00) and RYCIX (43.00) have comparable annual turnover. FDTGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCIX: FDTGX (0) vs RYCIX (2500). RYCIX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDTGX: RYCIX (1000) vs FDTGX (500). RYCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.75 vs. FDTGX (-6.93). FDTGX return over 5 years is better than : 18.50 vs. RYCIX (-11.47).
| FDTGX | RYCIX | FDTGX / RYCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.40 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.43 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.646 | 2.522 | -105% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.25B | 39.3M | 3,186% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 1.53 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.93 | -3.75 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | -4.63 | -16.71 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.50 | -11.47 | -161% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.14 | -12.44 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...