Ad is loading...
FDTGX vs RYCIX
FDTGX vs RYCIX Comparison
Open Charts FDTGX vs RYCIX
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Staples M
Price$85.62
Change+$1.70 (+2.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.26B
Rydex Consumer Products I
Price$151.61
Change+$2.65 (+1.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.02M
FDTGX vs RYCIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTGX vs. RYCIX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTGX is a Buy and RYCIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDTGX has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. RYCIX (39M). FDTGX (1.57) and RYCIX (1.52) have matching dividends . FDTGX was incepted earlier than RYCIX: FDTGX (18 years) vs RYCIX (27 years). RYCIX (1.43) is less costly to investors than FDTGX (1.23). FDTGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 54.00 vs. RYCIX (43.00). FDTGX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYCIX: FDTGX (0) vs RYCIX (2500). RYCIX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FDTGX: RYCIX (1000) vs FDTGX (500). RYCIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.35 vs. FDTGX (-3.52). FDTGX return over 5 years is better than : 15.68 vs. RYCIX (-12.93).
| FDTGX | RYCIX | FDTGX / RYCIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.40 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 1.43 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.417 | 1.541 | -222% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 1000 | 50% |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 39M | 3,238% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.57 | 1.52 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.52 | -0.35 | 995% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.60 | -19.24 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.68 | -12.93 | -121% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.71 | -13.75 | 42% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...