Ad is loading...
FDTS vs FNDC
FDTS vs FNDC Comparison
Open Charts FDTS vs FNDC
First Trust DevMkts exUS SC AlphaDEX®ETF
Price$41.25
Change+$0.50 (+1.23%)
Volume$243
Net Assets6.14M
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$35.19
Change-$0.12 (-0.34%)
Volume$100
Net Assets3.08B
FDTS vs FNDC Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTS vs. FNDC commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTS is a StrongBuy and FNDC is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 3.08B vs. FDTS (6.14M). FNDC has a higher annual dividend yield than FDTS: FNDC (3.427) vs FDTS (2.174). FDTS was incepted earlier than FNDC: FDTS (13 years) vs FNDC (11 years). FDTS has a higher turnover FNDC (30.00) vs FNDC (30.00).
| FDTS | FNDC | FDTS / FNDC | |
| Gain YTD | 2.174 | 3.427 | 63% |
| Net Assets | 6.14M | 3.08B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 124.00 | 30.00 | 413% |
| Yield | 3.02 | 2.82 | 107% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDTS | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 73% | 24 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDTS has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDTS jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDTS | 100% | N/A | ||
| MT - FDTS | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.15% | ||
| HBM - FDTS | 57% Loosely correlated | +3.03% | ||
| CE - FDTS | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| APAM - FDTS | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.23% | ||
| CTS - FDTS | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
More | ||||
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been closely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | +1.29% | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 68% Closely correlated | +2.35% | ||
| MT - FNDC | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.15% | ||
| CE - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| INTU - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.96% | ||
| CG - FNDC | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
More | ||||