Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTS vs FNDC
FDTS vs FNDC Comparison
Open Charts FDTS vs FNDC
First Trust DevMkts exUS SC AlphaDEX®ETF
Price$56.13
Change-$0.26 (-0.46%)
Volume$1.44K
Net Assets8.39M
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$44.80
Change-$0.27 (-0.60%)
Volume$151.88K
Net Assets3.02B
FDTS vs FNDC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTS vs. FNDC commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTS is a Buy and FNDC is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 3.02B vs. FDTS (8.39M). FDTS has a higher annual dividend yield than FNDC: FDTS (42.921) vs FNDC (31.842). FDTS was incepted earlier than FNDC: FDTS (14 years) vs FNDC (12 years). FNDC (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than FDTS (0.80). FDTS has a higher turnover FNDC (33.00) vs FNDC (33.00).
| FDTS | FNDC | FDTS / FNDC | |
| Gain YTD | 42.921 | 31.842 | 135% |
| Net Assets | 8.39M | 3.02B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.39 | 205% |
| Turnover | 117.00 | 33.00 | 355% |
| Yield | 2.93 | 2.64 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDTS | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDTS has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDTS jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDTS | 100% | -0.48% | ||
| MT - FDTS | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| CE - FDTS | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.71% | ||
| APAM - FDTS | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.74% | ||
| CTS - FDTS | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.41% | ||
| KAR - FDTS | 50% Loosely correlated | -2.50% | ||
More | ||||
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been closely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then ING could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | -0.60% | ||
| ING - FNDC | 67% Closely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| MT - FNDC | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| FER - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| INTU - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.19% | ||
More | ||||