Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTS vs FNDC
FDTS vs FNDC Comparison
Open Charts FDTS vs FNDC
First Trust DevMkts exUS SC AlphaDEX®ETF
Price$51.05
Change-$0.52 (-1.01%)
Volume$178
Net Assets7.69M
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$41.94
Change+$0.04 (+0.10%)
Volume$183.95K
Net Assets2.93B
FDTS vs FNDC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTS vs. FNDC commentary
Aug 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTS is a Hold and FNDC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 2.93B vs. FDTS (7.69M). FDTS has a higher annual dividend yield than FNDC: FDTS (30.006) vs FNDC (23.425). FDTS was incepted earlier than FNDC: FDTS (13 years) vs FNDC (12 years). FNDC (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than FDTS (0.80). FDTS has a higher turnover FNDC (33.00) vs FNDC (33.00).
| FDTS | FNDC | FDTS / FNDC | |
| Gain YTD | 30.006 | 23.425 | 128% |
| Net Assets | 7.69M | 2.93B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.39 | 205% |
| Turnover | 117.00 | 33.00 | 355% |
| Yield | 3.14 | 2.76 | 114% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDTS | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 79% | 11 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDTS has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDTS jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDTS | 100% | -0.99% | ||
| MT - FDTS | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| HBM - FDTS | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.27% | ||
| CE - FDTS | 57% Loosely correlated | -7.05% | ||
| APAM - FDTS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| CTS - FDTS | 51% Loosely correlated | -5.02% | ||
More | ||||
FNDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNDC has been closely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNDC jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FNDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FNDC | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| BNT - FNDC | 69% Closely correlated | -2.39% | ||
| MT - FNDC | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| MFG - FNDC | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| INTU - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.14% | ||
| ERO - FNDC | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
More | ||||