Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTS vs FNDC
FDTS vs FNDC Comparison
Open Charts FDTS vs FNDC
First Trust DevMkts exUS SC AlphaDEX®ETF
Price$56.36
Change-$0.54 (-0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.49M
Schwab Fundamental International SmEqETF
Price$44.54
Change-$0.12 (-0.27%)
Volume$855
Net Assets3.04B
FDTS vs FNDC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTS vs. FNDC commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTS is a Buy and FNDC is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNDC has more net assets: 3.04B vs. FDTS (8.49M). FDTS has a higher annual dividend yield than FNDC: FDTS (45.710) vs FNDC (31.430). FDTS was incepted earlier than FNDC: FDTS (14 years) vs FNDC (12 years). FNDC (0.39) has a lower expense ratio than FDTS (0.80). FDTS has a higher turnover FNDC (33.00) vs FNDC (33.00).
| FDTS | FNDC | FDTS / FNDC | |
| Gain YTD | 45.710 | 31.430 | 145% |
| Net Assets | 8.49M | 3.04B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.39 | 205% |
| Turnover | 117.00 | 33.00 | 355% |
| Yield | 3.20 | 2.60 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDTS | FNDC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 14 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDTS has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDTS jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDTS | 100% | N/A | ||
| MT - FDTS | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.90% | ||
| CE - FDTS | 57% Loosely correlated | -3.79% | ||
| APAM - FDTS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| CTS - FDTS | 51% Loosely correlated | -4.49% | ||
| KAR - FDTS | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.37% | ||
More | ||||