Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDTS vs PDN
FDTS vs PDN Comparison
Open Charts FDTS vs PDN
First Trust DevMkts exUS SC AlphaDEX®ETF
Price$48.72
Change+$0.51 (+1.06%)
Volume$875
Net Assets7.32M
Invesco RAFI Developed Mkts ex-US S-METF
Price$37.80
Change-$0.03 (-0.08%)
Volume$163
Net Assets359.22M
FDTS vs PDN Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDTS vs. PDN commentary
Jun 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDTS is a Buy and PDN is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PDN has more net assets: 359M vs. FDTS (7.32M). FDTS has a higher annual dividend yield than PDN: FDTS (22.510) vs PDN (20.633). FDTS was incepted earlier than PDN: FDTS (13 years) vs PDN (18 years). PDN (0.49) has a lower expense ratio than FDTS (0.80). FDTS has a higher turnover PDN (30.00) vs PDN (30.00).
| FDTS | PDN | FDTS / PDN | |
| Gain YTD | 22.510 | 20.633 | 109% |
| Net Assets | 7.32M | 359M | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.49 | 163% |
| Turnover | 117.00 | 30.00 | 390% |
| Yield | 3.13 | 3.11 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 18 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| PDN | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 30 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDTS has been loosely correlated with MT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDTS jumps, then MT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDTS | 100% | N/A | ||
| MT - FDTS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| HBM - FDTS | 57% Loosely correlated | +2.13% | ||
| CE - FDTS | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| APAM - FDTS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| CTS - FDTS | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.58% | ||
More | ||||
PDN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PDN has been closely correlated with BNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PDN jumps, then BNT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y