FDVA
Price
$10.61
Change
+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Updated
Dec 23 closing price
30 days until earnings call
GPFOF
Price
$2.35
Change
-$0.06 (-2.49%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

FDVA vs GPFOF

Header iconFDVA vs GPFOF Comparison
Open Charts FDVA vs GPFOFBanner chart's image
FREEDOM FINL
Price$10.61
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Grupo Financiero Inbursa, S.A. de C.V
Price$2.35
Change-$0.06 (-2.49%)
Volume$79.96K
CapitalizationN/A
FDVA vs GPFOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FDVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPFOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDVA vs. GPFOF commentary
Dec 26, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDVA is a Hold and GPFOF is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2024
Stock price -- (FDVA: $10.61 vs. GPFOF: $2.35)
Brand notoriety: FDVA and GPFOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDVA: 9% vs. GPFOF: 802%
Market capitalization -- FDVA: $81.19M vs. GPFOF: $14.96B
FDVA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $81.19M. GPFOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $14.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDVA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGPFOF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FDVA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GPFOF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GPFOF is a better buy in the long-term than FDVA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDVA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GPFOF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDVA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GPFOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GPFOF is a better buy in the short-term than FDVA.

Price Growth

FDVA (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.38% price change this week, while GPFOF (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

FDVA is expected to report earnings on Jan 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.69% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPFOF($15B) has a higher market cap than FDVA($81.2M). FDVA (9.64) and GPFOF (9.60) have similar P/E ratio . FDVA YTD gains are higher at: 1.823 vs. GPFOF (-10.305). FDVA has less debt than GPFOF: FDVA (47.6M) vs GPFOF (68.2B). GPFOF has higher revenues than FDVA: GPFOF (62.4B) vs FDVA (35.7M).
FDVAGPFOFFDVA / GPFOF
Capitalization81.2M15B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.823-10.305-18%
P/E Ratio9.649.60100%
Revenue35.7M62.4B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt47.6M68.2B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDVA vs GPFOF: Fundamental Ratings
FDVA
GPFOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7990
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8537
SMR RATING
1..100
782
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5150
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1482
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4450

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FDVA's Valuation (64) in the null industry is in the same range as GPFOF (65). This means that FDVA’s stock grew similarly to GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDVA (85). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDVA’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FDVA (78). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew significantly faster than FDVA’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as FDVA (51). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew similarly to FDVA’s over the last 12 months.

FDVA's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GPFOF (82). This means that FDVA’s stock grew significantly faster than GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDVAGPFOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
45%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
44%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FDVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPFOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RMQAX550.4114.14
+2.64%
Rydex Monthly Rbl NASDAQ-100® 2x Strt A
WFDSX31.700.26
+0.83%
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl Inst
DOXGX260.511.68
+0.65%
Dodge & Cox Stock X
SWFCX13.250.04
+0.30%
Touchstone International Value C
HIOCX15.720.03
+0.19%
Hartford International Opportunities C

FDVA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FDVA and GPFOF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FDVA and GPFOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDVA
1D Price
Change %
FDVA100%
N/A
GPFOF - FDVA
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNRN - FDVA
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBWA - FDVA
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ISTR - FDVA
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
ESQ - FDVA
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
More

GPFOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPFOF has been loosely correlated with BNCZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPFOF jumps, then BNCZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPFOF
1D Price
Change %
GPFOF100%
N/A
BNCZF - GPFOF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CSHX - GPFOF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ALBKY - GPFOF
37%
Loosely correlated
+4.11%
SLRK - GPFOF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OSBK - GPFOF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.23%
More