FDVA
Price
$11.35
Change
+$0.05 (+0.44%)
Updated
Jul 9 closing price
Capitalization
81.19M
7 days until earnings call
GPFOF
Price
$2.56
Change
-$0.06 (-2.29%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
14.96B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FDVA vs GPFOF

Header iconFDVA vs GPFOF Comparison
Open Charts FDVA vs GPFOFBanner chart's image
FREEDOM FINL
Price$11.35
Change+$0.05 (+0.44%)
Volume$291
Capitalization81.19M
Grupo Financiero Inbursa, S.A. de C.V
Price$2.56
Change-$0.06 (-2.29%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization14.96B
FDVA vs GPFOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FDVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPFOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDVA vs. GPFOF commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDVA is a Buy and GPFOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FDVA: $11.35 vs. GPFOF: $2.56)
Brand notoriety: FDVA and GPFOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDVA: 18% vs. GPFOF: 54%
Market capitalization -- FDVA: $81.19M vs. GPFOF: $14.96B
FDVA [@Regional Banks] is valued at $81.19M. GPFOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $14.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDVA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGPFOF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FDVA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GPFOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GPFOF is a better buy in the long-term than FDVA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDVA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GPFOF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDVA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • GPFOF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FDVA is a better buy in the short-term than GPFOF.

Price Growth

FDVA (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GPFOF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

FDVA is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.22% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPFOF($15B) has a higher market cap than FDVA($81.2M). FDVA (9.64) and GPFOF (9.60) have similar P/E ratio . FDVA YTD gains are higher at: 9.981 vs. GPFOF (8.936). FDVA has less debt than GPFOF: FDVA (47.6M) vs GPFOF (68.2B). GPFOF has higher revenues than FDVA: GPFOF (62.4B) vs FDVA (35.7M).
FDVAGPFOFFDVA / GPFOF
Capitalization81.2M15B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.9818.936112%
P/E Ratio9.649.60100%
Revenue35.7M62.4B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt47.6M68.2B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDVA vs GPFOF: Fundamental Ratings
FDVA
GPFOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1832
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5432
SMR RATING
1..100
792
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5048
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1252
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
20n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GPFOF's Valuation (56) in the null industry is in the same range as FDVA (85). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew similarly to FDVA’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as FDVA (54). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew similarly to FDVA’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FDVA (79). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew significantly faster than FDVA’s over the last 12 months.

GPFOF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as FDVA (50). This means that GPFOF’s stock grew similarly to FDVA’s over the last 12 months.

FDVA's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GPFOF (52). This means that FDVA’s stock grew somewhat faster than GPFOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDVAGPFOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
19%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
41%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
20%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FDVA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPFOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFUS68.160.45
+0.66%
Dimensional US Equity Market ETF
SBIT27.900.16
+0.58%
ProShares UltraShort Bitcoin ETF
FLC17.140.02
+0.09%
Flaherty & Crumrine Total Return Fund
FLMI24.00-0.04
-0.17%
Franklin Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF
CORN17.55-0.08
-0.43%
Teucrium Corn Fund

FDVA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FDVA and GPFOF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FDVA and GPFOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDVA
1D Price
Change %
FDVA100%
N/A
GPFOF - FDVA
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNRN - FDVA
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBWA - FDVA
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ISTR - FDVA
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.42%
ESQ - FDVA
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.97%
More

GPFOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPFOF has been loosely correlated with BNCZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GPFOF jumps, then BNCZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPFOF
1D Price
Change %
GPFOF100%
N/A
BNCZF - GPFOF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CSHX - GPFOF
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
ALBKY - GPFOF
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
SLRK - GPFOF
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.12%
OSBK - GPFOF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More