Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDWM vs RECS
FDWM vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts FDWM vs RECS
Fidelity Women's Leadership ETF
Price$24.29
Change-$0.09 (-0.37%)
Volume$1.15K
Net Assets4.27M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$37.06
Change-$0.12 (-0.32%)
Volume$513.06K
Net Assets3.08B
FDWM vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDWM vs. RECS commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDWM is a Buy and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.08B vs. FDWM (4.27M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than FDWM: RECS (7.048) vs FDWM (5.947). FDWM was incepted earlier than RECS: FDWM (4 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FDWM (0.59). FDWM has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| FDWM | RECS | FDWM / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 5.947 | 7.048 | 84% |
| Net Assets | 4.27M | 3.08B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.15 | 393% |
| Turnover | 59.00 | 49.00 | 120% |
| Yield | 0.57 | 0.65 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDWM | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 75% | 7 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 9 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SEF | 32.64 | 0.54 | +1.67% |
| ProShares Short Financials | |||
| VRIG | 25.13 | 0.01 | +0.04% |
| Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grd ETF | |||
| LFAQ | 150.76 | N/A | N/A |
| LifeX 2056 Longevity Income ETF | |||
| JMSI | 49.02 | -0.12 | -0.24% |
| JPMorgan Sustainable Municipal Inc ETF | |||
| DBEZ | 51.33 | -0.30 | -0.57% |
| Xtrackers MSCI Eurozone Hedged Eq ETF | |||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.32% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -1.12% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.83% | ||
More | ||||