Ad is loading...
FDWM vs RECS
FDWM vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts FDWM vs RECS
Fidelity Women's Leadership ETF
Price$21.84
Change+$0.11 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.78M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$33.53
Change+$0.21 (+0.63%)
Volume$2.38K
Net Assets2.21B
FDWM vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDWM vs. RECS commentary
Apr 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDWM is a Buy and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.21B vs. FDWM (3.78M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than FDWM: RECS (-3.755) vs FDWM (-5.398). FDWM was incepted earlier than RECS: FDWM (4 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FDWM (0.59). FDWM has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| FDWM | RECS | FDWM / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -5.398 | -3.755 | 144% |
| Net Assets | 3.78M | 2.21B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.15 | 393% |
| Turnover | 59.00 | 49.00 | 120% |
| Yield | 0.59 | 0.73 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDWM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDWM has been loosely correlated with VLTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDWM jumps, then VLTO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDWM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDWM | 100% | -1.60% | ||
| VLTO - FDWM | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| CART - FDWM | 28% Poorly correlated | +0.83% | ||
| DIS - FDWM | 14% Poorly correlated | -1.03% | ||
| CVS - FDWM | 13% Poorly correlated | +0.34% | ||
| SEDG - FDWM | 11% Poorly correlated | +3.12% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.33% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.75% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.81% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
More | ||||