Ad is loading...
FDWM vs RECS
FDWM vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts FDWM vs RECS
Fidelity Women's Leadership ETF
Price$20.65
Change+$0.31 (+1.52%)
Volume$396
Net Assets3.61M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$32.32
Change+$0.67 (+2.12%)
Volume$388
Net Assets2.32B
FDWM vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDWM vs. RECS commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDWM is a Buy and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.32B vs. FDWM (3.61M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than FDWM: RECS (-6.615) vs FDWM (-11.458). FDWM was incepted earlier than RECS: FDWM (4 years) vs RECS (6 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than FDWM (0.59). FDWM has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| FDWM | RECS | FDWM / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | -11.458 | -6.615 | 173% |
| Net Assets | 3.61M | 2.32B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.15 | 393% |
| Turnover | 59.00 | 49.00 | 120% |
| Yield | 0.59 | 0.73 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDWM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDWM has been loosely correlated with VLTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDWM jumps, then VLTO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDWM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDWM | 100% | N/A | ||
| VLTO - FDWM | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| ATI - FDWM | 53% Loosely correlated | +10.52% | ||
| MLKN - FDWM | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| DELL - FDWM | 49% Loosely correlated | +6.04% | ||
| GEV - FDWM | 46% Loosely correlated | +3.07% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +2.15% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +3.29% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +6.16% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +3.45% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +5.22% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.52% | ||
More | ||||