Ad is loading...
FDWM vs RECS
FDWM vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts FDWM vs RECS
Fidelity Women's Leadership ETF
Price$23.37
Change+$0.38 (+1.65%)
Volume$317
Net Assets4.72M
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$35.36
Change+$0.32 (+0.91%)
Volume$746.56K
Net Assets1.67B
FDWM vs RECS Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDWM vs. RECS commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDWM is a Hold and RECS is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 1.67B vs. FDWM (4.72M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than FDWM: RECS (2.137) vs FDWM (1.574). FDWM was incepted earlier than RECS: FDWM (4 years) vs RECS (5 years). FDWM has a higher turnover RECS (45.00) vs RECS (45.00).
| FDWM | RECS | FDWM / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 1.574 | 2.137 | 74% |
| Net Assets | 4.72M | 1.67B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 72.00 | 45.00 | 160% |
| Yield | 0.72 | 0.89 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDWM | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 87% | 11 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 85% | 11 days ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 80% | 11 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 72% | 11 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 70% | 19 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDWM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDWM has been loosely correlated with VLTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDWM jumps, then VLTO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDWM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDWM | 100% | N/A | ||
| VLTO - FDWM | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| CART - FDWM | 24% Poorly correlated | -0.56% | ||
| DIS - FDWM | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
| CVS - FDWM | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.27% | ||
| SEDG - FDWM | 11% Poorly correlated | -2.11% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.91% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +2.39% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +2.24% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +1.05% | ||
| JHG - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.83% | ||
| LRCX - RECS | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.36% | ||
More | ||||