Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDYZX vs GFACX
FDYZX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts FDYZX vs GFACX
Franklin DynaTech Adv
Price$217.64
Change+$0.01 (+0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.43B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$75.28
Change+$0.05 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
FDYZX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDYZX vs. GFACX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDYZX is a Buy and GFACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. FDYZX (29.4B). FDYZX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FDYZX was incepted earlier than GFACX: FDYZX (17 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FDYZX (0.54). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FDYZX (11.94). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDYZX: GFACX (250) vs FDYZX (100000). FDYZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.32 vs. GFACX (15.28). FDYZX return over 5 years is better than : 81.62 vs. GFACX (38.56).
| FDYZX | GFACX | FDYZX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.36 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.36 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.989 | 18.068 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.4B | 340B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.32 | 15.28 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 107.66 | 56.18 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 81.62 | 38.56 | 212% |
| Returns for 10 years | 338.24 | 84.37 | 401% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement