Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDYZX vs GFACX
FDYZX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts FDYZX vs GFACX
Franklin DynaTech Adv
Price$199.89
Change+$2.82 (+1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets27.49B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$70.62
Change+$0.69 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
FDYZX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDYZX vs. GFACX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDYZX is a Buy and GFACX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. FDYZX (27.5B). FDYZX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . FDYZX was incepted earlier than GFACX: FDYZX (17 years) vs GFACX (24 years). GFACX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FDYZX (0.54). GFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FDYZX (11.94). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDYZX: GFACX (250) vs FDYZX (100000). FDYZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.09 vs. GFACX (8.68). FDYZX return over 5 years is better than : 74.61 vs. GFACX (39.40).
| FDYZX | GFACX | FDYZX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.36 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 1.36 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.289 | 10.759 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.5B | 323B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.09 | 8.68 | 162% |
| Returns for 3 years | 94.60 | 52.72 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.61 | 39.40 | 189% |
| Returns for 10 years | 296.37 | 67.66 | 438% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement