Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDYZX vs GFAFX
FDYZX vs GFAFX Comparison
Open Charts FDYZX vs GFAFX
Franklin DynaTech Adv
Price$207.77
Change-$0.32 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets28.37B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$82.93
Change-$0.15 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.74B
FDYZX vs GFAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDYZX vs. GFAFX commentary
Aug 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDYZX is a Buy and GFAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 325B vs. FDYZX (28.4B). GFAFX pays higher dividends than FDYZX: GFAFX (0.30) vs FDYZX (0.00). FDYZX was incepted earlier than GFAFX: FDYZX (17 years) vs GFAFX (24 years). GFAFX (0.67) is less costly to investors than FDYZX (0.54). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FDYZX (11.94). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FDYZX: GFAFX (250) vs FDYZX (100000). FDYZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.26 vs. GFAFX (21.61). FDYZX return over 5 years is better than : 70.79 vs. GFAFX (42.41).
| FDYZX | GFAFX | FDYZX / GFAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.67 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.67 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.773 | 12.432 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 250 | 40,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 28.4B | 325B | 9% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.30 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.26 | 21.61 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.40 | 45.28 | 167% |
| Returns for 5 years | 70.79 | 42.41 | 167% |
| Returns for 10 years | 301.41 | 83.63 | 360% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement