Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEAAX vs PNSIX
FEAAX vs PNSIX Comparison
Open Charts FEAAX vs PNSIX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia A
Price$51.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets436.6M
T. Rowe Price New Asia I
Price$17.67
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.85B
FEAAX vs PNSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEAAX vs. PNSIX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEAAX is a Buy and PNSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNSIX has more cash in the bank: 1.85B vs. FEAAX (437M). PNSIX pays higher dividends than FEAAX: PNSIX (1.26) vs FEAAX (0.00). FEAAX was incepted earlier than PNSIX: FEAAX (31 years) vs PNSIX (9 years). FEAAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than PNSIX (0.86). FEAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. PNSIX (54.80). FEAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PNSIX: FEAAX (0) vs PNSIX (500000). FEAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.67 vs. PNSIX (7.06). FEAAX return over 5 years is better than : 26.98 vs. PNSIX (7.43).
| FEAAX | PNSIX | FEAAX / PNSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.83 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.86 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.386 | 5.999 | 156% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 437M | 1.85B | 24% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.26 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.67 | 7.06 | 264% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.07 | 11.51 | 435% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.98 | 7.43 | 363% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement