Ad is loading...
FEAAX vs PNSIX
FEAAX vs PNSIX Comparison
Open Charts FEAAX vs PNSIX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia A
Price$44.17
Change-$1.00 (-2.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets437.26M
T. Rowe Price New Asia I
Price$15.53
Change-$0.22 (-1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.67B
FEAAX vs PNSIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEAAX vs. PNSIX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEAAX is a Hold and PNSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNSIX has more cash in the bank: 1.67B vs. FEAAX (437M). PNSIX pays higher dividends than FEAAX: PNSIX (1.25) vs FEAAX (0.00). FEAAX was incepted earlier than PNSIX: FEAAX (31 years) vs PNSIX (9 years). FEAAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than PNSIX (0.86). FEAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. PNSIX (54.80). FEAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PNSIX: FEAAX (0) vs PNSIX (500000). FEAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.12 vs. PNSIX (-0.89). FEAAX return over 5 years is better than : 21.16 vs. PNSIX (-1.45).
| FEAAX | PNSIX | FEAAX / PNSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.83 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.86 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.421 | -5.519 | 62% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 437M | 1.67B | 26% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.25 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.12 | -0.89 | -1,133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.20 | -6.81 | -296% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.16 | -1.45 | -1,464% |
| Returns for 10 years | 32.15 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...