Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEAAX vs PNSIX
FEAAX vs PNSIX Comparison
Open Charts FEAAX vs PNSIX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia A
Price$59.06
Change+$0.94 (+1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets520.52M
T. Rowe Price New Asia I
Price$19.19
Change-$0.03 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95B
FEAAX vs PNSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEAAX vs. PNSIX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEAAX is a Buy and PNSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNSIX has more cash in the bank: 1.95B vs. FEAAX (521M). PNSIX pays higher dividends than FEAAX: PNSIX (1.10) vs FEAAX (0.00). FEAAX was incepted earlier than PNSIX: FEAAX (31 years) vs PNSIX (10 years). FEAAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than PNSIX (0.86). FEAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. PNSIX (54.80). FEAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PNSIX: FEAAX (0) vs PNSIX (500000). FEAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.16 vs. PNSIX (16.00). FEAAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.29 vs. PNSIX (-7.37).
| FEAAX | PNSIX | FEAAX / PNSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.83 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.86 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.278 | 15.117 | 174% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 500000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 521M | 1.95B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.10 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.16 | 16.00 | 245% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.63 | 24.72 | 302% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.29 | -7.37 | -112% |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.28 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement