Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEAAX vs TRZNX
FEAAX vs TRZNX Comparison
Open Charts FEAAX vs TRZNX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia A
Price$59.06
Change+$0.94 (+1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets520.52M
T. Rowe Price New Asia Z
Price$19.15
Change-$0.03 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.95B
FEAAX vs TRZNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZNX has more cash in the bank: 1.95B vs. FEAAX (521M). TRZNX pays higher dividends than FEAAX: TRZNX (1.98) vs FEAAX (0.00). FEAAX was incepted earlier than TRZNX: FEAAX (31 years) vs TRZNX (5 years). FEAAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than TRZNX (0.83). FEAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. TRZNX (54.80). FEAAX (0) and TRZNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FEAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.16 vs. TRZNX (16.97).
| FEAAX | TRZNX | FEAAX / TRZNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.83 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 26.278 | 15.780 | 167% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 521M | 1.95B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.98 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.16 | 16.97 | 231% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.63 | 27.81 | 268% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.29 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 122.28 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement