Ad is loading...
FEAAX vs TRZNX
FEAAX vs TRZNX Comparison
Open Charts FEAAX vs TRZNX
Fidelity Advisor Emerging Asia A
Price$47.87
Change+$0.51 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets437.26M
T. Rowe Price New Asia Z
Price$16.58
Change+$0.10 (+0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.75B
FEAAX vs TRZNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRZNX has more cash in the bank: 1.75B vs. FEAAX (437M). TRZNX pays higher dividends than FEAAX: TRZNX (2.26) vs FEAAX (0.00). FEAAX was incepted earlier than TRZNX: FEAAX (31 years) vs TRZNX (4 years). FEAAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than TRZNX (0.83). FEAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. TRZNX (54.80). FEAAX (0) and TRZNX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FEAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.46 vs. TRZNX (7.33).
| FEAAX | TRZNX | FEAAX / TRZNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.83 | 147% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.261 | -0.363 | -348% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 437M | 1.75B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 2.26 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.46 | 7.33 | 238% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.32 | 6.48 | 591% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.09 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.94 | N/A | - |