FECCF
Price
$4.59
Change
-$0.15 (-3.16%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
688.29M
27 days until earnings call
SM
Price
$25.32
Change
-$5.19 (-17.01%)
Updated
Apr 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.77B
20 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FECCF vs SM

Header iconFECCF vs SM Comparison
Open Charts FECCF vs SMBanner chart's image
Frontera Energy
Price$4.59
Change-$0.15 (-3.16%)
Volume$2.55K
Capitalization688.29M
SM Energy
Price$25.32
Change-$5.19 (-17.01%)
Volume$40.02K
Capitalization5.77B
FECCF vs SM Comparison Chart
Loading...
FECCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FECCF vs. SM commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FECCF is a Hold and SM is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FECCF: $4.37 vs. SM: $25.33)
Brand notoriety: FECCF and SM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FECCF: 47% vs. SM: 186%
Market capitalization -- FECCF: $688.29M vs. SM: $5.77B
FECCF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $688.29M. SM’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $5.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.17B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FECCF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FECCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SM is a better buy in the long-term than FECCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FECCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FECCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SM is a better buy in the short-term than FECCF.

Price Growth

FECCF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -9.34% price change this week, while SM (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -16.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -3.45%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

FECCF is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

SM is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-3.45% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SM($5.77B) has a higher market cap than FECCF($688M). SM has higher P/E ratio than FECCF: SM (7.37) vs FECCF (4.24). FECCF YTD gains are higher at: -23.244 vs. SM (-34.330). SM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.7B vs. FECCF (715M). SM has more cash in the bank: 616M vs. FECCF (162M). FECCF has less debt than SM: FECCF (519M) vs SM (1.58B). SM has higher revenues than FECCF: SM (2.36B) vs FECCF (1.35B).
FECCFSMFECCF / SM
Capitalization688M5.77B12%
EBITDA715M1.7B42%
Gain YTD-23.244-34.33068%
P/E Ratio4.247.3758%
Revenue1.35B2.36B57%
Total Cash162M616M26%
Total Debt519M1.58B33%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FECCF vs SM: Fundamental Ratings
FECCF
SM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
88
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8035
SMR RATING
1..100
9146
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7984
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1488
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FECCF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as SM (42) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that FECCF’s stock grew similarly to SM’s over the last 12 months.

SM's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FECCF (80) in the null industry. This means that SM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FECCF’s over the last 12 months.

SM's SMR Rating (46) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FECCF (91) in the null industry. This means that SM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FECCF’s over the last 12 months.

FECCF's Price Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as SM (84) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that FECCF’s stock grew similarly to SM’s over the last 12 months.

FECCF's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SM (88) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that FECCF’s stock grew significantly faster than SM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FECCFSM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
81%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FECCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CPER30.07-1.46
-4.63%
United States Copper Index
PSIL11.05-0.55
-4.76%
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF
MMLG26.04-1.89
-6.77%
First Trust Multi-Manager Large Gr ETF
EES46.06-3.43
-6.93%
WisdomTree US SmallCap Earnings ETF
RSPT32.08-2.61
-7.52%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Tech ETF

FECCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FECCF has been loosely correlated with TALO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FECCF jumps, then TALO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FECCF
1D Price
Change %
FECCF100%
-3.23%
TALO - FECCF
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.16%
SM - FECCF
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.52%
OVV - FECCF
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
VET - FECCF
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.87%
OXY - FECCF
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.28%
More

SM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SM has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SM jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SM
1D Price
Change %
SM100%
-17.01%
MTDR - SM
84%
Closely correlated
-14.67%
NOG - SM
81%
Closely correlated
-15.16%
OVV - SM
79%
Closely correlated
-11.53%
PR - SM
78%
Closely correlated
-13.54%
FANG - SM
77%
Closely correlated
-12.51%
More