It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FECCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTALO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FECCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TALO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
FECCF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -4.30% price change this week, while TALO (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -4.65% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.87%.
FECCF is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
TALO is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2025.
The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
FECCF | TALO | FECCF / TALO | |
Capitalization | 688M | 2.55B | 27% |
EBITDA | 715M | 1.05B | 68% |
Gain YTD | -8.775 | -20.731 | 42% |
P/E Ratio | 4.24 | 8.98 | 47% |
Revenue | 1.35B | 1.46B | 93% |
Total Cash | 162M | 33.6M | 482% |
Total Debt | 519M | 1.05B | 50% |
FECCF | TALO | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 42 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 77 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 17 | 54 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FECCF's Valuation (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TALO (71) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that FECCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TALO’s over the last 12 months.
FECCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TALO (100) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that FECCF’s stock grew similarly to TALO’s over the last 12 months.
FECCF's SMR Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as TALO (87) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that FECCF’s stock grew similarly to TALO’s over the last 12 months.
TALO's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as FECCF (77) in the null industry. This means that TALO’s stock grew similarly to FECCF’s over the last 12 months.
FECCF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TALO (54) in the Integrated Oil industry. This means that FECCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TALO’s over the last 12 months.
FECCF | TALO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago70% | 3 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago83% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago80% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago72% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago76% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago77% | 11 days ago74% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago84% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago87% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago83% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
ETIDX | 19.81 | -0.08 | -0.40% |
Eventide Dividend Growth I | |||
SEITX | 12.46 | -0.09 | -0.72% |
SEI International Equity F (SIT) | |||
PACLX | 37.54 | -0.43 | -1.13% |
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Adv | |||
ATGCX | 27.67 | -0.45 | -1.60% |
Aquila Opportunity Growth C | |||
HSLCX | 47.88 | -1.07 | -2.19% |
Hartford Small Cap Growth C |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FECCF has been loosely correlated with TALO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FECCF jumps, then TALO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FECCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FECCF | 100% | -2.03% | ||
TALO - FECCF | 48% Loosely correlated | -3.26% | ||
SM - FECCF | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.12% | ||
OVV - FECCF | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.08% | ||
VET - FECCF | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
OXY - FECCF | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.38% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TALO has been closely correlated with MTDR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TALO jumps, then MTDR could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TALO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TALO | 100% | -3.26% | ||
MTDR - TALO | 73% Closely correlated | -2.06% | ||
MGY - TALO | 72% Closely correlated | -1.43% | ||
CIVI - TALO | 71% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
OVV - TALO | 71% Closely correlated | -2.08% | ||
SM - TALO | 71% Closely correlated | -2.12% | ||
More |