Ad is loading...
FEDCX vs MEDBX
FEDCX vs MEDBX Comparison
Open Charts FEDCX vs MEDBX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt
Price$7.93
Change+$0.01 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.39B
MFS Emerging Markets Debt B
Price$11.98
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7B
FEDCX vs MEDBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEDCX vs. MEDBX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEDCX is a Hold and MEDBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDBX has more cash in the bank: 7B vs. FEDCX (1.4B). FEDCX (5.80) and MEDBX (5.77) have matching dividends . FEDCX was incepted earlier than MEDBX: FEDCX (14 years) vs MEDBX (23 years). MEDBX (1.82) is less costly to investors than FEDCX (0.01). MEDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. FEDCX (18.00). FEDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MEDBX: FEDCX (0) vs MEDBX (1000). FEDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.54 vs. MEDBX (5.96). FEDCX return over 5 years is better than : 23.94 vs. MEDBX (11.39).
| FEDCX | MEDBX | FEDCX / MEDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.81 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.82 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.322 | 1.339 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.4B | 7B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.80 | 5.77 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.54 | 5.96 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.73 | 16.38 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.94 | 11.39 | 210% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.48 | 21.51 | 197% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...