Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEDCX vs MEDBX
FEDCX vs MEDBX Comparison
Open Charts FEDCX vs MEDBX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Debt
Price$8.07
Change+$0.02 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.45B
MFS Emerging Markets Debt B
Price$12.22
Change+$0.02 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.3B
FEDCX vs MEDBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEDCX vs. MEDBX commentary
Jul 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEDCX is a Hold and MEDBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDBX has more cash in the bank: 7.3B vs. FEDCX (1.45B). FEDCX pays higher dividends than MEDBX: FEDCX (5.65) vs MEDBX (5.06). FEDCX was incepted earlier than MEDBX: FEDCX (14 years) vs MEDBX (23 years). MEDBX (1.82) is less costly to investors than FEDCX (0.01). MEDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. FEDCX (18.00). FEDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MEDBX: FEDCX (0) vs MEDBX (1000). FEDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.32 vs. MEDBX (6.75). FEDCX return over 5 years is better than : 16.54 vs. MEDBX (5.66).
| FEDCX | MEDBX | FEDCX / MEDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.81 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.82 | 1% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.312 | 3.917 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.45B | 7.3B | 20% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.65 | 5.06 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.32 | 6.75 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.96 | 28.67 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.54 | 5.66 | 292% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.10 | 27.32 | 183% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement