Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FEMSX vs RNWBX
FEMSX vs RNWBX Comparison
Open Charts FEMSX vs RNWBX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opps
Price$23.88
Change-$0.06 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.63B
American Funds New World R2
Price$89.32
Change+$0.06 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.16B
FEMSX vs RNWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FEMSX vs. RNWBX commentary
Nov 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FEMSX is a Hold and RNWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWBX has more cash in the bank: 73.2B vs. FEMSX (26.6B). FEMSX pays higher dividends than RNWBX: FEMSX (1.53) vs RNWBX (0.12). FEMSX was incepted earlier than RNWBX: FEMSX (17 years) vs RNWBX (23 years). RNWBX (1.67) is less costly to investors than FEMSX (0.03). FEMSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. RNWBX (37.00). FEMSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RNWBX: FEMSX (0) vs RNWBX (250). FEMSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.21 vs. RNWBX (16.64). RNWBX return over 5 years is better than : 14.52 vs. FEMSX (11.57).
| FEMSX | RNWBX | FEMSX / RNWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.01 | 1.67 | 1% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 1.67 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.349 | 21.441 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.6B | 73.2B | 36% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.53 | 0.12 | 1,304% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.21 | 16.64 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.76 | 41.27 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.57 | 14.52 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.73 | 80.38 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement