FENG
Price
$2.05
Change
-$0.06 (-2.84%)
Updated
May 8 closing price
Capitalization
23.54M
10 days until earnings call
SMWB
Price
$7.44
Change
-$0.01 (-0.13%)
Updated
May 8 closing price
Capitalization
708.48M
4 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FENG vs SMWB

Header iconFENG vs SMWB Comparison
Open Charts FENG vs SMWBBanner chart's image
Phoenix New Media
Price$2.05
Change-$0.06 (-2.84%)
Volume$7.06K
Capitalization23.54M
Similarweb
Price$7.44
Change-$0.01 (-0.13%)
Volume$475.33K
Capitalization708.48M
FENG vs SMWB Comparison Chart
Loading...
SMWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FENG vs. SMWB commentary
May 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FENG is a StrongBuy and SMWB is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 09, 2025
Stock price -- (FENG: $2.05 vs. SMWB: $7.44)
Brand notoriety: FENG and SMWB are both not notable
FENG represents the Internet Software/Services, while SMWB is part of the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FENG: 30% vs. SMWB: 123%
Market capitalization -- FENG: $23.54M vs. SMWB: $708.48M
FENG [@Internet Software/Services] is valued at $23.54M. SMWB’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $708.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Software/Services] industry ranges from $1.94T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Software/Services] industry is $67.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.33B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FENG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMWB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FENG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMWB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FENG is a better buy in the long-term than SMWB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMWB’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SMWB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

FENG (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а -6.39% price change this week, while SMWB (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was +10.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +33.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.32%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

FENG is expected to report earnings on May 19, 2025.

SMWB is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Software/Services (+10.67% weekly)

Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.

@Packaged Software (+3.03% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMWB($708M) has a higher market cap than FENG($23.5M). FENG YTD gains are higher at: -13.502 vs. SMWB (-47.495). SMWB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -18.55M vs. FENG (-101.9M). FENG has more cash in the bank: 1.03B vs. SMWB (71.7M). SMWB has less debt than FENG: SMWB (67.4M) vs FENG (75.2M). FENG has higher revenues than SMWB: FENG (704M) vs SMWB (218M).
FENGSMWBFENG / SMWB
Capitalization23.5M708M3%
EBITDA-101.9M-18.55M549%
Gain YTD-13.502-47.49528%
P/E Ratio0.95N/A-
Revenue704M218M323%
Total Cash1.03B71.7M1,432%
Total Debt75.2M67.4M112%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FENG: Fundamental Ratings
FENG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMWB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SMWB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MRTN13.170.48
+3.78%
Marten Transport Ltd
HPQ26.330.48
+1.86%
HP
RM28.900.22
+0.77%
REGIONAL MANAGEMENT Corp
LOPE192.84-1.17
-0.60%
Grand Canyon Education
WAI2.24-0.19
-7.82%
Top KingWin Ltd

FENG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FENG and LCFY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FENG and LCFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FENG
1D Price
Change %
FENG100%
-2.84%
LCFY - FENG
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
CMCM - FENG
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.40%
JFIN - FENG
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATDRY - FENG
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
TRUE - FENG
21%
Poorly correlated
+9.85%
More

SMWB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMWB has been loosely correlated with BL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMWB jumps, then BL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMWB
1D Price
Change %
SMWB100%
-0.13%
BL - SMWB
59%
Loosely correlated
+4.52%
TDC - SMWB
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.39%
TWLO - SMWB
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.61%
DASH - SMWB
44%
Loosely correlated
+3.37%
TBLA - SMWB
44%
Loosely correlated
+9.15%
More