Advertisement
FENG vs WB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FENG is a Hold and WB is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FENG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FENG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- WB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FENG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WB’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FENG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- WB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FENG (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WB (@Internet Software/Services) price change was -4.08% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -3.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.35%.
Reported Earning Dates
WB is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Internet Software/Services (-3.38% weekly)Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.
| FENG | WB | FENG / WB | |
| Capitalization | 25.3M | 2.37B | 1% |
| EBITDA | -64.82M | 552M | -12% |
| Gain YTD | -11.392 | 12.834 | -89% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 5.51 | - |
| Revenue | 725M | 1.76B | 41% |
| Total Cash | 976M | 2.11B | 46% |
| Total Debt | 49.2M | 1.87B | 3% |
FENG | WB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 1 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | 3 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 88 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 52 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 43 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
WB's Valuation (3) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FENG (37) in the Broadcasting industry. This means that WB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FENG’s over the last 12 months.
WB's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as FENG (100) in the Broadcasting industry. This means that WB’s stock grew similarly to FENG’s over the last 12 months.
WB's SMR Rating (65) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as FENG (88) in the Broadcasting industry. This means that WB’s stock grew similarly to FENG’s over the last 12 months.
WB's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as FENG (73) in the Broadcasting industry. This means that WB’s stock grew similarly to FENG’s over the last 12 months.
WB's P/E Growth Rating (52) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FENG (95) in the Broadcasting industry. This means that WB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FENG’s over the last 12 months.
| FENG | WB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | about 1 month ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 76% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IRCIX | 12.63 | 0.35 | +2.85% |
| Voya Russell Small Cap Index Port S2 | |||
| BGVCX | 35.00 | 0.55 | +1.60% |
| Brandes Global Equity C | |||
| CDEYX | 18.83 | 0.27 | +1.45% |
| Columbia Intrinsic Value Institutional 3 | |||
| RIGIX | 44.69 | 0.31 | +0.70% |
| American Funds Intl Gr and Inc R5E | |||
| WWSYX | 19.18 | N/A | N/A |
| Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund Ultra | |||
FENG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FENG and LCFY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FENG and LCFY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FENG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FENG | 100% | -2.33% | ||
| LCFY - FENG | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.05% | ||
| JFIN - FENG | 25% Poorly correlated | -4.95% | ||
| BZ - FENG | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
| ATDRY - FENG | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.40% | ||
| TRUE - FENG | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.42% | ||
More | ||||
WB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WB has been loosely correlated with TCEHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WB jumps, then TCEHY could also see price increases.