FENG
Price
$2.06
Change
-$0.02 (-0.96%)
Updated
Dec 2, 11:15 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
25.02M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WB
Price
$10.41
Change
+$0.13 (+1.26%)
Updated
Dec 2, 04:48 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.5B
92 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FENG vs WB

Header iconFENG vs WB Comparison
Open Charts FENG vs WBBanner chart's image
Phoenix New Media
Price$2.06
Change-$0.02 (-0.96%)
Volume$100
Capitalization25.02M
Weibo
Price$10.41
Change+$0.13 (+1.26%)
Volume$290
Capitalization2.5B
FENG vs WB Comparison Chart in %
FENG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FENG vs. WB commentary
Dec 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FENG is a Buy and WB is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 02, 2025
Stock price -- (FENG: $2.08 vs. WB: $10.30)
Brand notoriety: FENG: Not notable vs. WB: Notable
Both companies represent the Internet Software/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FENG: 8% vs. WB: 132%
Market capitalization -- FENG: $25.02M vs. WB: $2.5B
FENG [@Internet Software/Services] is valued at $25.02M. WB’s [@Internet Software/Services] market capitalization is $2.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Software/Services] industry ranges from $3.8T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Software/Services] industry is $92.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FENG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FENG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, WB is a better buy in the long-term than FENG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FENG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FENG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WB is a better buy in the short-term than FENG.

Price Growth

FENG (@Internet Software/Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WB (@Internet Software/Services) price change was +3.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Software/Services industry was -0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

WB is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Software/Services (-0.24% weekly)

Companies in this industry typically license software on a subscription basis and it is centrally hosted. Such products usually go by the names web-based software, on-demand software and hosted software. Cloud computing has emerged as a major force in this space, making it possible to save files to a remote database (without requiring them to be saved on local storage device); as long as a device has access to the web, it can access the data and the software programs to run it. This has in many cases facilitated cost efficiency, speed and security of data for businesses and consumers. Alphabet Inc., Facebook, Inc. and Yahoo! Inc. are some well-known names in the internet software/services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WB($2.51B) has a higher market cap than FENG($25M). WB YTD gains are higher at: 20.375 vs. FENG (-12.236). WB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 552M vs. FENG (-64.82M). WB has more cash in the bank: 2.11B vs. FENG (976M). FENG has less debt than WB: FENG (49.2M) vs WB (1.87B). WB has higher revenues than FENG: WB (1.76B) vs FENG (725M).
FENGWBFENG / WB
Capitalization25M2.51B1%
EBITDA-64.82M552M-12%
Gain YTD-12.23620.375-60%
P/E RatioN/A5.68-
Revenue725M1.76B41%
Total Cash976M2.11B46%
Total Debt49.2M1.87B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FENG vs WB: Fundamental Ratings
FENG
WB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
32
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8765
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7861
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9560
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WB's Valuation (3) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FENG (37) in the Broadcasting industry. This means that WB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FENG’s over the last 12 months.

WB's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as FENG (100) in the Broadcasting industry. This means that WB’s stock grew similarly to FENG’s over the last 12 months.

WB's SMR Rating (65) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as FENG (87) in the Broadcasting industry. This means that WB’s stock grew similarly to FENG’s over the last 12 months.

WB's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as FENG (78) in the Broadcasting industry. This means that WB’s stock grew similarly to FENG’s over the last 12 months.

WB's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FENG (95) in the Broadcasting industry. This means that WB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FENG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FENGWB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FENG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FXNC24.590.09
+0.39%
First National Corp
CP72.36-0.21
-0.29%
Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
HLIT9.43-0.14
-1.41%
Harmonic
KYMR66.86-1.02
-1.50%
Kymera Therapeutics
SVRE0.90-0.03
-2.82%
SaverOne 2014 Ltd

FENG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FENG and LCFY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FENG and LCFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FENG
1D Price
Change %
FENG100%
-1.72%
LCFY - FENG
26%
Poorly correlated
-5.34%
JFIN - FENG
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.89%
BZ - FENG
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
ATDRY - FENG
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
TRUE - FENG
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WB has been loosely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WB jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WB
1D Price
Change %
WB100%
+3.57%
BILI - WB
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.30%
TCEHY - WB
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
BIDU - WB
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.41%
ATHM - WB
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
BZ - WB
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
More