Advertisement
FESNF vs FREVS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FESNF is a Hold and FREVS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FESNF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFREVS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FESNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- FREVS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FESNF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FREVS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FESNF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
- FREVS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FESNF (@Managed Health Care) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FREVS (@Media Conglomerates) price change was +1.40% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was +1.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.82%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.68%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Managed Health Care (+1.15% weekly)Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.
@Media Conglomerates (+0.21% weekly)Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
| FESNF | FREVS | FESNF / FREVS | |
| Capitalization | 455M | 108M | 421% |
| EBITDA | 71.3M | 13.3M | 536% |
| Gain YTD | 3.773 | -14.364 | -26% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.04 | 31.41 | 45% |
| Revenue | 101M | 29M | 348% |
| Total Cash | 35.6M | 35.1M | 101% |
| Total Debt | 462M | 121M | 382% |
FESNF | FREVS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 37 | 3 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 25 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 36 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 80 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 40 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FESNF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as FREVS (25). This means that FESNF’s stock grew similarly to FREVS’s over the last 12 months.
FREVS's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FESNF (100). This means that FREVS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FESNF’s over the last 12 months.
FREVS's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FESNF (100). This means that FREVS’s stock grew similarly to FESNF’s over the last 12 months.
FESNF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as FREVS (80). This means that FESNF’s stock grew similarly to FREVS’s over the last 12 months.
FREVS's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as FESNF (8). This means that FREVS’s stock grew similarly to FESNF’s over the last 12 months.
| FESNF | FREVS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 52% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 45% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 45% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 41% | 3 days ago 44% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 38% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HFQCX | 6.87 | 0.04 | +0.59% |
| Janus Henderson Global Equity Income C | |||
| GSTRX | 10.93 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth R | |||
| IIRMX | 10.84 | N/A | N/A |
| Voya Russell Mid Cap Index Port I | |||
| AZMIX | 20.68 | N/A | N/A |
| Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value Ins | |||
| RTOUX | 42.48 | N/A | N/A |
| Russell Inv Tax-Managed US Mid&Sm Cap M | |||
FESNF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FESNF has been loosely correlated with MAPIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FESNF jumps, then MAPIF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FESNF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FESNF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MAPIF - FESNF | 38% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| LNSPF - FESNF | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DOC - FESNF | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.10% | ||
| CHTH - FESNF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MEIYF - FESNF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
FREVS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FREVS and EFRTF have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FREVS and EFRTF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FREVS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FREVS | 100% | N/A | ||
| EFRTF - FREVS | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.57% | ||
| FRIVF - FREVS | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DREUF - FREVS | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.49% | ||
| FRMUF - FREVS | -1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FESNF - FREVS | -5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||