Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs GLCRX
FFAFX vs GLCRX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs GLCRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$84.42
Change-$1.71 (-1.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.02B
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts R
Price$31.30
Change-$0.68 (-2.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
FFAFX vs GLCRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. GLCRX (1.6B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than GLCRX: FFAFX (0.53) vs GLCRX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than GLCRX: FFAFX (5 years) vs GLCRX (18 years). GLCRX (1.20) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). GLCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 215.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). GLCRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: GLCRX (0) vs FFAFX (250). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.85 vs. GLCRX (1.43). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.26 vs. GLCRX (-17.85).
| FFAFX | GLCRX | FFAFX / GLCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.17 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.20 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.774 | 12.447 | 111% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 1.6B | 20,601% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.85 | 1.43 | 340% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.39 | 34.99 | 181% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.26 | -17.85 | -192% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.12 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement