Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs GLCUX
FFAFX vs GLCUX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs GLCUX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$86.13
Change+$0.46 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts R6
Price$38.40
Change+$0.30 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.58B
FFAFX vs GLCUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. GLCUX (1.59B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than GLCUX: FFAFX (0.53) vs GLCUX (0.05). FFAFX was incepted earlier than GLCUX: FFAFX (5 years) vs GLCUX (10 years). GLCUX (0.58) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). GLCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 215.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLCUX: FFAFX (250) vs GLCUX (5000000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.25 vs. GLCUX (3.07). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.98 vs. GLCUX (-7.49).
| FFAFX | GLCUX | FFAFX / GLCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.55 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.58 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.078 | 12.191 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 1.59B | 20,631% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.05 | 1,032% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.25 | 3.07 | 236% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.80 | 42.72 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.98 | -7.49 | -493% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 64.49 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement