Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs LGLRX
FFAFX vs LGLRX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs LGLRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$86.13
Change+$0.46 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R3
Price$51.78
Change+$0.45 (+0.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.6B
FFAFX vs LGLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. LGLRX (7.6B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLRX: FFAFX (0.53) vs LGLRX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLRX: FFAFX (5 years) vs LGLRX (14 years). LGLRX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). LGLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). LGLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: LGLRX (0) vs FFAFX (250). LGLRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.14 vs. FFAFX (7.25). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.98 vs. LGLRX (14.94).
| FFAFX | LGLRX | FFAFX / LGLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.15 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.15 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.078 | 13.286 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 7.6B | 4,303% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.25 | 13.14 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.80 | 104.18 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.98 | 14.94 | 248% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 115.58 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement