Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs LGLRX
FFAFX vs LGLRX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs LGLRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$89.01
Change-$0.13 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets343.07B
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R3
Price$55.34
Change+$0.22 (+0.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.24B
FFAFX vs LGLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. LGLRX (8.24B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than LGLRX: FFAFX (0.55) vs LGLRX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than LGLRX: FFAFX (5 years) vs LGLRX (14 years). LGLRX (1.15) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). LGLRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 94.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). LGLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: LGLRX (0) vs FFAFX (250). LGLRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 34.08 vs. FFAFX (14.14).
| FFAFX | LGLRX | FFAFX / LGLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.15 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.15 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.960 | 21.651 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 8.24B | 4,162% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.14 | 34.08 | 41% |
| Returns for 3 years | 80.03 | 124.16 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 24.90 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 141.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement