Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs MBCZX
FFAFX vs MBCZX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs MBCZX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$88.54
Change+$0.76 (+0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets337.93B
MassMutual Blue Chip Growth I
Price$27.23
Change+$0.19 (+0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.14B
FFAFX vs MBCZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. MBCZX (2.14B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than MBCZX: FFAFX (0.53) vs MBCZX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than MBCZX: FFAFX (5 years) vs MBCZX (12 years). MBCZX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. MBCZX (11.00). MBCZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: MBCZX (0) vs FFAFX (250). MBCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.22 vs. FFAFX (8.40). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 36.26 vs. MBCZX (-10.96).
| FFAFX | MBCZX | FFAFX / MBCZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.65 | 54% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.65 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.326 | 15.725 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 338B | 2.14B | 15,809% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.40 | 14.22 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.55 | 36.22 | 186% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.26 | -10.96 | -331% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 46.01 | - |