Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs MDFGX
FFAFX vs MDFGX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs MDFGX
FFAFX vs MDFGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAFX vs. MDFGX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAFX is a Hold and MDFGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. MDFGX (3.7B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than MDFGX: FFAFX (0.45) vs MDFGX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than MDFGX: FFAFX (6 years) vs MDFGX (29 years). MDFGX (0.97) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). MDFGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 99.00 vs. FFAFX (32.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDFGX: FFAFX (250) vs MDFGX (1000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.87 vs. MDFGX (-19.73). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.33 vs. MDFGX (-22.46).
| FFAFX | MDFGX | FFAFX / MDFGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.92 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.97 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.484 | -10.664 | -70% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 3.7B | 9,535% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.87 | -19.73 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.87 | 6.22 | 689% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.33 | -22.46 | -59% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 33.56 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement