Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs MIGWX
FFAFX vs MIGWX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs MIGWX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$84.42
Change-$1.71 (-1.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.02B
Marsico Growth Institutional
Price$28.13
Change-$0.49 (-1.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets393.53M
FFAFX vs MIGWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. MIGWX (394M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than MIGWX: FFAFX (0.53) vs MIGWX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than MIGWX: FFAFX (5 years) vs MIGWX (4 years). MIGWX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). MIGWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIGWX: FFAFX (250) vs MIGWX (100000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.85 vs. MIGWX (2.29).
| FFAFX | MIGWX | FFAFX / MIGWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.08 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.08 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 4 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.774 | 9.739 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 100000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 329B | 394M | 83,503% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.85 | 2.29 | 212% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.39 | 94.56 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.26 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement