Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs MSHMX
FFAFX vs MSHMX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs MSHMX
FFAFX vs MSHMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. MSHMX (3.78M). MSHMX pays higher dividends than FFAFX: MSHMX (0.54) vs FFAFX (0.44). FFAFX was incepted earlier than MSHMX: FFAFX (6 years) vs MSHMX (6 years). MSHMX (6.28) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). MSHMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFAFX (32.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSHMX: FFAFX (250) vs MSHMX (1000000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.62 vs. MSHMX (-11.65). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.41 vs. MSHMX (-12.28).
| FFAFX | MSHMX | FFAFX / MSHMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 0.85 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 6.28 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.567 | 3.303 | 290% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361B | 3.78M | 9,550,265% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 0.54 | 82% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.62 | -11.65 | -65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.34 | 1.61 | 2,943% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.41 | -12.28 | -166% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TBWIX | 23.14 | 0.12 | +0.52% |
| Thornburg Better World International I | |||
| EMGNX | 42.04 | N/A | N/A |
| Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Inst | |||
| BGLYX | 12.82 | N/A | N/A |
| Brookfield Global Listed InfrastructureI | |||
| OAKEX | 21.11 | -0.02 | -0.09% |
| Oakmark International Small Cap Investor | |||
| FESGX | 79.69 | -0.20 | -0.25% |
| First Eagle Global C | |||