Ad is loading...
FFAFX vs NWADX
FFAFX vs NWADX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs NWADX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$70.17
Change+$0.84 (+1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets274.2B
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr Eagle
Price$17.51
Change+$0.28 (+1.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets168.2M
FFAFX vs NWADX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 274B vs. NWADX (168M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than NWADX: FFAFX (0.68) vs NWADX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than NWADX: FFAFX (4 years) vs NWADX (7 years). NWADX (1.01) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWADX (8.16). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWADX: FFAFX (250) vs NWADX (50000). NWADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.38 vs. FFAFX (3.70).
| FFAFX | NWADX | FFAFX / NWADX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.92 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.01 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.431 | -10.073 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 50000 | 1% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 274B | 168M | 163,095% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.70 | 5.38 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.08 | 25.31 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 36.75 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...