Ad is loading...
FFAFX vs NWZLX
FFAFX vs NWZLX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs NWZLX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$69.56
Change+$0.09 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets275.85B
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr A
Price$16.78
Change+$0.02 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets171.5M
FFAFX vs NWZLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 276B vs. NWZLX (171M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than NWZLX: FFAFX (0.63) vs NWZLX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than NWZLX: FFAFX (4 years) vs NWZLX (8 years). NWZLX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWZLX (8.16). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZLX: FFAFX (250) vs NWZLX (2000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.52 vs. NWZLX (-0.24).
| FFAFX | NWZLX | FFAFX / NWZLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.27 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.36 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.253 | -9.650 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 276B | 171M | 161,404% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.52 | -0.24 | -637% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.50 | 17.20 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 58.26 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...