Ad is loading...
FFAFX vs NWZLX
FFAFX vs NWZLX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs NWZLX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$69.33
Change+$1.72 (+2.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets267.42B
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr A
Price$16.67
Change+$0.47 (+2.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets163.47M
FFAFX vs NWZLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 267B vs. NWZLX (163M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than NWZLX: FFAFX (0.68) vs NWZLX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than NWZLX: FFAFX (4 years) vs NWZLX (8 years). NWZLX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWZLX (8.16). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZLX: FFAFX (250) vs NWZLX (2000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.82 vs. NWZLX (0.87).
| FFAFX | NWZLX | FFAFX / NWZLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.27 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.36 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.563 | -12.668 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 267B | 163M | 163,804% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.82 | 0.87 | 208% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.77 | 15.30 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 29.50 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |