Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs NWZLX
FFAFX vs NWZLX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs NWZLX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$78.37
Change+$0.76 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.87B
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr A
Price$19.18
Change+$0.27 (+1.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets193.03M
FFAFX vs NWZLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 305B vs. NWZLX (193M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than NWZLX: FFAFX (0.62) vs NWZLX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than NWZLX: FFAFX (5 years) vs NWZLX (8 years). NWZLX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. NWZLX (8.16). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZLX: FFAFX (250) vs NWZLX (2000). FFAFX (9.65) and NWZLX (9.37) have marching annual gain over last year.
| FFAFX | NWZLX | FFAFX / NWZLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.27 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.36 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.620 | 1.941 | 290% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305B | 193M | 158,031% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.65 | 9.37 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.20 | 43.80 | 89% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 33.92 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |