Ad is loading...
FFAFX vs RDLAX
FFAFX vs RDLAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs RDLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$66.99
Change+$1.05 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets260.89B
Columbia Disciplined Growth A
Price$9.27
Change+$0.17 (+1.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.26M
FFAFX vs RDLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 261B vs. RDLAX (252M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than RDLAX: FFAFX (0.68) vs RDLAX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than RDLAX: FFAFX (4 years) vs RDLAX (18 years). RDLAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). RDLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLAX: FFAFX (250) vs RDLAX (2000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.99 vs. RDLAX (-12.42).
| FFAFX | RDLAX | FFAFX / RDLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.06 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.17 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.717 | -15.584 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 261B | 252M | 103,571% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.99 | -12.42 | 40% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.16 | -3.29 | -248% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 10.57 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -0.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...