Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs RDLAX
FFAFX vs RDLAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs RDLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$85.67
Change-$0.60 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Columbia Disciplined Growth A
Price$12.30
Change-$0.13 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.04M
FFAFX vs RDLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. RDLAX (309M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than RDLAX: FFAFX (0.53) vs RDLAX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than RDLAX: FFAFX (5 years) vs RDLAX (19 years). RDLAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). RDLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLAX: FFAFX (250) vs RDLAX (2000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.46 vs. RDLAX (5.85). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.80 vs. RDLAX (11.11).
| FFAFX | RDLAX | FFAFX / RDLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.06 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.17 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.458 | 14.100 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 309M | 105,825% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.46 | 5.85 | 128% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.91 | 49.82 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.80 | 11.11 | 322% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 30.22 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers