Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs RDLAX
FFAFX vs RDLAX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs RDLAX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$87.71
Change+$0.18 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
Columbia Disciplined Growth A
Price$12.43
Change+$0.06 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets308.94M
FFAFX vs RDLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. RDLAX (309M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than RDLAX: FFAFX (0.55) vs RDLAX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than RDLAX: FFAFX (5 years) vs RDLAX (18 years). RDLAX (1.17) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). RDLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLAX: FFAFX (250) vs RDLAX (2000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.67 vs. RDLAX (7.01).
| FFAFX | RDLAX | FFAFX / RDLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.06 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.17 | 30% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.965 | 14.750 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 336B | 309M | 108,738% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.67 | 7.01 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 74.07 | 56.98 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 11.74 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 36.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement