Ad is loading...
FFAFX vs RDLCX
FFAFX vs RDLCX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs RDLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$72.47
Change+$0.54 (+0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets283.8B
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$8.49
Change+$0.07 (+0.83%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets259.38M
FFAFX vs RDLCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 284B vs. RDLCX (259M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than RDLCX: FFAFX (0.67) vs RDLCX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than RDLCX: FFAFX (5 years) vs RDLCX (18 years). RDLCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLCX: FFAFX (250) vs RDLCX (2000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.94 vs. RDLCX (-5.50).
| FFAFX | RDLCX | FFAFX / RDLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.81 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.92 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.332 | -8.578 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 284B | 259M | 109,653% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.94 | -5.50 | -72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.81 | 11.23 | 319% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 0.48 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -7.06 | - |