Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs RDLCX
FFAFX vs RDLCX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs RDLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$80.93
Change+$0.84 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets313.68B
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$9.41
Change+$0.08 (+0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets280.98M
FFAFX vs RDLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 314B vs. RDLCX (281M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than RDLCX: FFAFX (0.62) vs RDLCX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than RDLCX: FFAFX (5 years) vs RDLCX (18 years). RDLCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLCX: FFAFX (250) vs RDLCX (2000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.32 vs. RDLCX (-3.22).
| FFAFX | RDLCX | FFAFX / RDLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.81 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.92 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.070 | 1.303 | 696% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 314B | 281M | 111,744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.32 | -3.22 | -321% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.78 | 25.57 | 210% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 5.30 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 5.78 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement