Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs RDLCX
FFAFX vs RDLCX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs RDLCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$89.39
Change+$0.60 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.99B
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$10.83
Change+$0.13 (+1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets318.88M
FFAFX vs RDLCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. RDLCX (319M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than RDLCX: FFAFX (0.55) vs RDLCX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than RDLCX: FFAFX (5 years) vs RDLCX (18 years). RDLCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. FFAFX (25.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLCX: FFAFX (250) vs RDLCX (2000). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.66 vs. RDLCX (9.50).
| FFAFX | RDLCX | FFAFX / RDLCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.81 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.92 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.472 | 17.590 | 116% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343B | 319M | 107,524% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.66 | 9.50 | 154% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.55 | 47.95 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 6.39 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 19.01 | - |