Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs TBDCX
FFAFX vs TBDCX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs TBDCX
FFAFX vs TBDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAFX vs. TBDCX commentary
Sep 21, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAFX is a Hold and TBDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. TBDCX (437M). FFAFX pays higher dividends than TBDCX: FFAFX (0.45) vs TBDCX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than TBDCX: FFAFX (6 years) vs TBDCX (27 years). TBDCX (1.87) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.34). TBDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 122.00 vs. FFAFX (32.00). FFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TBDCX: FFAFX (250) vs TBDCX (1000). TBDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.00 vs. FFAFX (-0.78). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.96 vs. TBDCX (-10.51).
| FFAFX | TBDCX | FFAFX / TBDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.81 | 19% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.34 | 1.87 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.031 | 6.073 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 353B | 437M | 80,778% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.78 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.70 | 35.72 | 128% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.96 | -10.51 | -142% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 42.78 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement