Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs WLGRX
FFAFX vs WLGRX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs WLGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$85.67
Change-$0.60 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund R
Price$35.20
Change-$0.43 (-1.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.84B
FFAFX vs WLGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. WLGRX (7.84B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than WLGRX: FFAFX (0.53) vs WLGRX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than WLGRX: FFAFX (5 years) vs WLGRX (20 years). WLGRX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGRX (18.00). WLGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: WLGRX (0) vs FFAFX (250). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.46 vs. WLGRX (4.23). FFAFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.80 vs. WLGRX (26.12).
| FFAFX | WLGRX | FFAFX / WLGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.14 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.22 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.458 | 5.737 | 269% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 327B | 7.84B | 4,173% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.53 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.46 | 4.23 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.91 | 46.12 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.80 | 26.12 | 137% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 81.35 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers