Ad is loading...
FFAFX vs WLGRX
FFAFX vs WLGRX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs WLGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$66.69
Change-$3.97 (-5.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets279.82B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund R
Price$30.04
Change-$1.29 (-4.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.79B
FFAFX vs WLGRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 280B vs. WLGRX (7.79B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than WLGRX: FFAFX (0.68) vs WLGRX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than WLGRX: FFAFX (4 years) vs WLGRX (19 years). WLGRX (1.24) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGRX (9.00). WLGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: WLGRX (0) vs FFAFX (250). WLGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.63 vs. FFAFX (0.48).
| FFAFX | WLGRX | FFAFX / WLGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.14 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.24 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.771 | -5.888 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 280B | 7.79B | 3,596% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.68 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.48 | 5.63 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.50 | 6.17 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 67.27 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 66.83 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...