Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs WLGRX
FFAFX vs WLGRX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs WLGRX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$89.14
Change+$0.67 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.58B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund R
Price$36.41
Change+$0.23 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.04B
FFAFX vs WLGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 341B vs. WLGRX (8.04B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than WLGRX: FFAFX (0.55) vs WLGRX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than WLGRX: FFAFX (5 years) vs WLGRX (20 years). WLGRX (1.24) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGRX (18.00). WLGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: WLGRX (0) vs FFAFX (250). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.12 vs. WLGRX (10.17).
| FFAFX | WLGRX | FFAFX / WLGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.14 | 31% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.24 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.135 | 8.681 | 232% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 341B | 8.04B | 4,242% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.55 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.12 | 10.17 | 149% |
| Returns for 3 years | 78.24 | 60.30 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 30.38 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 96.31 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement