Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAFX vs WLGYX
FFAFX vs WLGYX Comparison
Open Charts FFAFX vs WLGYX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529F3
Price$88.24
Change+$0.07 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.23B
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund Y
Price$40.66
Change-$0.18 (-0.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.05B
FFAFX vs WLGYX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFAFX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. WLGYX (8.05B). FFAFX pays higher dividends than WLGYX: FFAFX (0.56) vs WLGYX (0.00). FFAFX was incepted earlier than WLGYX: FFAFX (5 years) vs WLGYX (25 years). WLGYX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FFAFX (0.35). FFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. WLGYX (18.00). WLGYX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFAFX: WLGYX (0) vs FFAFX (250). FFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.93 vs. WLGYX (10.50).
| FFAFX | WLGYX | FFAFX / WLGYX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.89 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.99 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.922 | 7.587 | 249% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 340B | 8.05B | 4,226% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.56 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.93 | 10.50 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 65.33 | 54.23 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 40.97 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 112.60 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement