Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAMX vs RLBBX
FFAMX vs RLBBX Comparison
Open Charts FFAMX vs RLBBX
FFAMX vs RLBBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAMX vs. RLBBX commentary
Jul 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAMX is a Hold and RLBBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBBX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FFAMX (10.9B). FFAMX pays higher dividends than RLBBX: FFAMX (1.90) vs RLBBX (1.12). FFAMX was incepted earlier than RLBBX: FFAMX (20 years) vs RLBBX (24 years). RLBBX (1.33) is less costly to investors than FFAMX (0.85). RLBBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFAMX (25.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBBX: FFAMX (0) vs RLBBX (250). RLBBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.61 vs. FFAMX (11.32). RLBBX return over 5 years is better than : 29.95 vs. FFAMX (17.15).
| FFAMX | RLBBX | FFAMX / RLBBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.33 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 1.33 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.963 | 8.890 | 101% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.9B | 288B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 1.12 | 170% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.32 | 12.61 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.99 | 39.04 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.15 | 29.95 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.24 | 76.17 | 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement