FFAMX
Price
$23.46
Change
-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Net Assets
10.93B
RLBEX
Price
$40.65
Change
-$0.02 (-0.05%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Net Assets
287.61B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFAMX vs RLBEX

FFAMX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFAMX vs. RLBEX commentary
Jul 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAMX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FFAMX (10.9B). FFAMX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: FFAMX (1.90) vs RLBEX (1.77). FFAMX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: FFAMX (20 years) vs RLBEX (24 years). FFAMX (0.85) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFAMX (25.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: FFAMX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.15 vs. FFAMX (10.50). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 34.03 vs. FFAMX (16.46).
FFAMXRLBEXFFAMX / RLBEX
Total Expense Ratio0.820.60137%
Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio0.850.60142%
Fund Existence20 years24 years-
Gain YTD8.3169.24990%
Front Load6%N/A-
Min. Initial Investment0250-
Min. Initial Investment IRAN/AN/A-
Net Assets10.9B288B4%
Annual Yield % from dividends1.901.77107%
Returns for 1 year10.5013.1580%
Returns for 3 years32.2042.1476%
Returns for 5 years16.4634.0348%
Returns for 10 years62.2787.6371%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VGPMX22.920.30
+1.33%
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Investor
IVEIX13.010.11
+0.85%
Nomura Climate Solutions I
HMVYX21.160.10
+0.47%
Hartford MidCap Value Y
SGIDX40.600.05
+0.12%
Steward Global Equity Income Fund A
RRBGX185.33-1.72
-0.92%
T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth R