Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAMX vs RLBEX
FFAMX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts FFAMX vs RLBEX
FFAMX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAMX vs. RLBEX commentary
Aug 31, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAMX is a Buy and RLBEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FFAMX (10.8B). FFAMX (1.84) and RLBEX (1.79) have matching dividends . FFAMX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: FFAMX (20 years) vs RLBEX (24 years). FFAMX (0.85) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFAMX (25.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: FFAMX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.81 vs. FFAMX (8.71). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 32.40 vs. FFAMX (15.80).
| FFAMX | RLBEX | FFAMX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.60 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.60 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.461 | 10.028 | 94% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.8B | 283B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.84 | 1.79 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.71 | 10.81 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.70 | 42.27 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.80 | 32.40 | 49% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.92 | 85.96 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement