Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAMX vs RLBEX
FFAMX vs RLBEX Comparison
Open Charts FFAMX vs RLBEX
FFAMX vs RLBEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAMX vs. RLBEX commentary
Jul 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAMX is a Hold and RLBEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBEX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FFAMX (10.9B). FFAMX pays higher dividends than RLBEX: FFAMX (1.90) vs RLBEX (1.77). FFAMX was incepted earlier than RLBEX: FFAMX (20 years) vs RLBEX (24 years). FFAMX (0.85) is less costly to investors than RLBEX (0.60). RLBEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFAMX (25.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBEX: FFAMX (0) vs RLBEX (250). RLBEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.49 vs. FFAMX (11.32). RLBEX return over 5 years is better than : 34.10 vs. FFAMX (17.15).
| FFAMX | RLBEX | FFAMX / RLBEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.60 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.60 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.963 | 9.303 | 96% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.9B | 288B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.90 | 1.77 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.32 | 13.49 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.99 | 42.21 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.15 | 34.10 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.24 | 87.73 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement