Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAMX vs RLBFX
FFAMX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts FFAMX vs RLBFX
FFAMX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAMX vs. RLBFX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAMX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FFAMX (10.9B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than FFAMX: RLBFX (2.03) vs FFAMX (1.82). FFAMX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: FFAMX (20 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). FFAMX (0.85) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). RLBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFAMX (25.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBFX: FFAMX (0) vs RLBFX (250). RLBFX (5.55) and FFAMX (5.29) have marching annual gain over last year. RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 31.96 vs. FFAMX (14.70).
| FFAMX | RLBFX | FFAMX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.30 | 273% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.30 | 283% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.837 | 7.455 | 105% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.9B | 285B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 2.03 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.29 | 5.55 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.85 | 41.25 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.70 | 31.96 | 46% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.06 | 86.00 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers