FFBC
Price
$24.33
Change
+$0.03 (+0.12%)
Updated
Oct 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.33B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
FFWM
Price
$5.43
Change
-$0.04 (-0.73%)
Updated
Oct 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
450.65M
9 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFBC vs FFWM

Header iconFFBC vs FFWM Comparison
Open Charts FFBC vs FFWMBanner chart's image
First Financial Ban
Price$24.33
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
Volume$9.01K
Capitalization2.33B
First Foundation
Price$5.43
Change-$0.04 (-0.73%)
Volume$4.17K
Capitalization450.65M
FFBC vs FFWM Comparison Chart in %
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBC vs. FFWM commentary
Oct 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBC is a StrongBuy and FFWM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 22, 2025
Stock price -- (FFBC: $24.30 vs. FFWM: $5.47)
Brand notoriety: FFBC and FFWM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBC: 84% vs. FFWM: 139%
Market capitalization -- FFBC: $2.33B vs. FFWM: $450.65M
FFBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.33B. FFWM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $450.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFFWM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FFWM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the long-term than FFWM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFBC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFWM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFBC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FFWM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the short-term than FFWM.

Price Growth

FFBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.53% price change this week, while FFWM (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +4.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

FFWM is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+4.83% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFBC($2.33B) has a higher market cap than FFWM($451M). FFWM has higher P/E ratio than FFBC: FFWM (41.60) vs FFBC (9.72). FFBC YTD gains are higher at: -7.007 vs. FFWM (-11.916). FFBC has less debt than FFWM: FFBC (1.03B) vs FFWM (1.84B). FFBC has higher revenues than FFWM: FFBC (852M) vs FFWM (66.3M).
FFBCFFWMFFBC / FFWM
Capitalization2.33B451M516%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.007-11.91659%
P/E Ratio9.7241.6023%
Revenue852M66.3M1,285%
Total Cash210MN/A-
Total Debt1.03B1.84B56%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBC vs FFWM: Fundamental Ratings
FFBC
FFWM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
709
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
23100
SMR RATING
1..100
1561
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6162
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6363
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFBC's Valuation (43) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWM (89). This means that FFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FFWM (100). This means that FFBC’s stock grew significantly faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWM (61). This means that FFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFWM (62). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's P/E Growth Rating (63) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFWM (63). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFBCFFWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PURRX20.83N/A
N/A
PGIM Global Real Estate R
BCAIX37.62N/A
N/A
Boston Common ESG Impact Intl
FINVX16.21N/A
N/A
Fidelity Series International Value
CENNX13.96N/A
N/A
Centerstone Investors C
HFYYX13.27N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val Y