FFBC
Price
$26.48
Change
-$0.05 (-0.19%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
2.51B
54 days until earnings call
FFWM
Price
$5.95
Change
+$0.09 (+1.54%)
Updated
Aug 29 closing price
Capitalization
490.2M
59 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFBC vs FFWM

Header iconFFBC vs FFWM Comparison
Open Charts FFBC vs FFWMBanner chart's image
First Financial Ban
Price$26.48
Change-$0.05 (-0.19%)
Volume$348.95K
Capitalization2.51B
First Foundation
Price$5.95
Change+$0.09 (+1.54%)
Volume$637.54K
Capitalization490.2M
FFBC vs FFWM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBC vs. FFWM commentary
Aug 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBC is a Buy and FFWM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 31, 2025
Stock price -- (FFBC: $26.48 vs. FFWM: $5.95)
Brand notoriety: FFBC and FFWM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBC: 82% vs. FFWM: 74%
Market capitalization -- FFBC: $2.51B vs. FFWM: $490.2M
FFBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.51B. FFWM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $490.2M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $166.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFFWM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FFWM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the long-term than FFWM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFBC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFWM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFBC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FFWM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FFBC and FFWM are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FFBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.26% price change this week, while FFWM (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

FFWM is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.27% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFBC($2.51B) has a higher market cap than FFWM($490M). FFWM has higher P/E ratio than FFBC: FFWM (41.60) vs FFBC (10.61). FFBC YTD gains are higher at: 0.379 vs. FFWM (-4.187). FFBC has less debt than FFWM: FFBC (1.03B) vs FFWM (1.84B). FFBC has higher revenues than FFWM: FFBC (852M) vs FFWM (66.3M).
FFBCFFWMFFBC / FFWM
Capitalization2.51B490M512%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.379-4.187-9%
P/E Ratio10.6141.6026%
Revenue852M66.3M1,285%
Total Cash191MN/A-
Total Debt1.03B1.84B56%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBC vs FFWM: Fundamental Ratings
FFBC
FFWM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1211
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
90
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
22100
SMR RATING
1..100
1561
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5246
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5366
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFBC's Valuation (47) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWM (90). This means that FFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FFWM (100). This means that FFBC’s stock grew significantly faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWM (61). This means that FFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

FFWM's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (52). This means that FFWM’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFWM (66). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFBCFFWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PNAIX82.45N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price All-Cap Opportunities-I
FITMX17.51N/A
N/A
Fidelity SAI International Mtm Idx
AQEIX18.90N/A
N/A
LKCM Aquinas Catholic Equity
HFYTX12.99N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders Intl Multi-Cp Val R5
HSLFX44.54N/A
N/A
Hartford Small Cap Growth F

FFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBC has been closely correlated with TCBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFBC jumps, then TCBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBC
1D Price
Change %
FFBC100%
-0.19%
TCBK - FFBC
92%
Closely correlated
-0.55%
EBC - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.71%
UBSI - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
PFS - FFBC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.30%
BANR - FFBC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
More

FFWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFWM has been closely correlated with STEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFWM jumps, then STEL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFWM
1D Price
Change %
FFWM100%
+1.54%
STEL - FFWM
73%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
TCBK - FFWM
73%
Closely correlated
-0.55%
SFBS - FFWM
73%
Closely correlated
-0.23%
HOPE - FFWM
73%
Closely correlated
-0.54%
UBSI - FFWM
72%
Closely correlated
-0.31%
More