FFBC
Price
$25.86
Change
+$0.24 (+0.94%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.08B
13 days until earnings call
FFWM
Price
$5.60
Change
+$0.07 (+1.27%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
407.13M
27 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFBC vs FFWM

Header iconFFBC vs FFWM Comparison
Open Charts FFBC vs FFWMBanner chart's image
First Financial Ban
Price$25.86
Change+$0.24 (+0.94%)
Volume$258.51K
Capitalization2.08B
First Foundation
Price$5.60
Change+$0.07 (+1.27%)
Volume$875.4K
Capitalization407.13M
FFBC vs FFWM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBC vs. FFWM commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBC is a StrongBuy and FFWM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FFBC: $25.86 vs. FFWM: $5.60)
Brand notoriety: FFBC and FFWM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBC: 76% vs. FFWM: 129%
Market capitalization -- FFBC: $2.08B vs. FFWM: $407.13M
FFBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.08B. FFWM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $407.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFFWM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FFWM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the long-term than FFWM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFBC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFWM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFBC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FFWM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFWM is a better buy in the short-term than FFBC.

Price Growth

FFBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.34% price change this week, while FFWM (@Regional Banks) price change was +8.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

FFWM is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFBC($2.08B) has a higher market cap than FFWM($407M). FFBC has higher P/E ratio than FFWM: FFBC (8.15) vs FFWM (3.63). FFBC YTD gains are higher at: -1.971 vs. FFWM (-9.823). FFBC has less debt than FFWM: FFBC (1.28B) vs FFWM (1.58B). FFBC has higher revenues than FFWM: FFBC (840M) vs FFWM (175M).
FFBCFFWMFFBC / FFWM
Capitalization2.08B407M512%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.971-9.82320%
P/E Ratio8.153.63224%
Revenue840M175M480%
Total Cash213MN/A-
Total Debt1.28B1.58B81%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBC vs FFWM: Fundamental Ratings
FFBC
FFWM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
572
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
37
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
25100
SMR RATING
1..100
1233
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4954
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3170
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFWM's Valuation (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (46). This means that FFWM’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FFWM (100). This means that FFBC’s stock grew significantly faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFWM (33). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFWM (54). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFWM (70). This means that FFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFWM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFBCFFWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFWM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMCCX47.33N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Stock Selec Mid Cp I
MITEX14.81N/A
N/A
Matthews Asia Innovators Institutional
HBLVX15.01N/A
N/A
Hartford Balanced Income R6
JGEMX12.88N/A
N/A
JHancock Global Equity R6
QMGCX11.98N/A
N/A
Invesco Advantage International C

FFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFBC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBC
1D Price
Change %
FFBC100%
+0.94%
UBSI - FFBC
93%
Closely correlated
+0.95%
CBU - FFBC
92%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
EBC - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+2.94%
HOPE - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
BANR - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+1.42%
More

FFWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFWM has been closely correlated with TCBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFWM jumps, then TCBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFWM
1D Price
Change %
FFWM100%
+1.27%
TCBK - FFWM
68%
Closely correlated
+1.27%
HOPE - FFWM
66%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
CTBI - FFWM
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.69%
CAC - FFWM
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.76%
FFBC - FFWM
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.94%
More