FFBC
Price
$27.95
Change
+$0.40 (+1.45%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.08B
4 days until earnings call
HAFC
Price
$22.74
Change
+$0.12 (+0.53%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
469.44M
9 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FFBC vs HAFC

Header iconFFBC vs HAFC Comparison
Open Charts FFBC vs HAFCBanner chart's image
First Financial Ban
Price$27.95
Change+$0.40 (+1.45%)
Volume$1.14M
Capitalization2.08B
Hanmi Financial
Price$22.74
Change+$0.12 (+0.53%)
Volume$107.32K
Capitalization469.44M
FFBC vs HAFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HAFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBC vs. HAFC commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBC is a Hold and HAFC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FFBC: $27.95 vs. HAFC: $22.74)
Brand notoriety: FFBC and HAFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBC: 275% vs. HAFC: 56%
Market capitalization -- FFBC: $2.08B vs. HAFC: $469.44M
FFBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.08B. HAFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $469.44M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHAFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HAFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAFC is a better buy in the long-term than FFBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFBC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAFC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HAFC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the short-term than HAFC.

Price Growth

FFBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +8.80% price change this week, while HAFC (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

HAFC is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFBC($2.08B) has a higher market cap than HAFC($469M). FFBC has higher P/E ratio than HAFC: FFBC (8.15) vs HAFC (5.92). FFBC YTD gains are higher at: 3.981 vs. HAFC (-3.726). FFBC has more cash in the bank: 213M vs. HAFC (78.8M). HAFC has less debt than FFBC: HAFC (455M) vs FFBC (1.28B). FFBC has higher revenues than HAFC: FFBC (840M) vs HAFC (250M).
FFBCHAFCFFBC / HAFC
Capitalization2.08B469M444%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.981-3.726-107%
P/E Ratio8.155.92138%
Revenue840M250M336%
Total Cash213M78.8M270%
Total Debt1.28B455M282%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBC vs HAFC: Fundamental Ratings
FFBC
HAFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1819
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4650
SMR RATING
1..100
1220
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4445
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2313
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HAFC's Valuation (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (59). This means that HAFC’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HAFC (50). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to HAFC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HAFC (20). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to HAFC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HAFC (45). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to HAFC’s over the last 12 months.

HAFC's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (23). This means that HAFC’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFBCHAFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HAFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JLPYX21.950.23
+1.06%
JPMorgan US Large Cap Core Plus R6
NEFFX63.320.57
+0.91%
American Funds New Economy F2
ISBAX14.660.13
+0.89%
VY® Columbia Contrarian Core A
CAAPX40.050.30
+0.75%
Ariel Appreciation Investor
PISLX13.000.05
+0.39%
Columbia Pyrford International Stck Inst

FFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFBC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBC
1D Price
Change %
FFBC100%
+1.45%
UBSI - FFBC
93%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
CBU - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+1.05%
EBC - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
NWBI - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
BUSE - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
More

HAFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAFC has been closely correlated with GSBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAFC jumps, then GSBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAFC
1D Price
Change %
HAFC100%
+0.53%
GSBC - HAFC
82%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
FFBC - HAFC
81%
Closely correlated
+1.45%
PFC - HAFC
81%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
CBU - HAFC
81%
Closely correlated
+1.05%
NWBI - HAFC
81%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
More