FFBC
Price
$23.69
Change
+$0.14 (+0.59%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
2.27B
75 days until earnings call
HAFC
Price
$22.76
Change
+$0.39 (+1.74%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
686.82M
80 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFBC vs HAFC

Header iconFFBC vs HAFC Comparison
Open Charts FFBC vs HAFCBanner chart's image
First Financial Ban
Price$23.69
Change+$0.14 (+0.59%)
Volume$184.38K
Capitalization2.27B
Hanmi Financial
Price$22.76
Change+$0.39 (+1.74%)
Volume$143.31K
Capitalization686.82M
FFBC vs HAFC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HAFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBC vs. HAFC commentary
Aug 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBC is a Hold and HAFC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 09, 2025
Stock price -- (FFBC: $23.69 vs. HAFC: $22.76)
Brand notoriety: FFBC and HAFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBC: 50% vs. HAFC: 89%
Market capitalization -- FFBC: $2.27B vs. HAFC: $686.82M
FFBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.27B. HAFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $686.82M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHAFC’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HAFC’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAFC is a better buy in the long-term than FFBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFBC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAFC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • HAFC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HAFC is a better buy in the short-term than FFBC.

Price Growth

FFBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.21% price change this week, while HAFC (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

HAFC is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.47% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFBC($2.27B) has a higher market cap than HAFC($687M). HAFC has higher P/E ratio than FFBC: HAFC (10.54) vs FFBC (9.48). HAFC YTD gains are higher at: -0.237 vs. FFBC (-10.197). FFBC has more cash in the bank: 191M vs. HAFC (78.8M). HAFC has less debt than FFBC: HAFC (248M) vs FFBC (1.15B). FFBC has higher revenues than HAFC: FFBC (841M) vs HAFC (238M).
FFBCHAFCFFBC / HAFC
Capitalization2.27B687M330%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-10.197-0.2374,302%
P/E Ratio9.4810.5490%
Revenue841M238M353%
Total Cash191M78.8M242%
Total Debt1.15B248M462%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBC vs HAFC: Fundamental Ratings
FFBC
HAFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6470
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2632
SMR RATING
1..100
1530
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6260
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5928
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HAFC's Valuation (22) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (41). This means that HAFC’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HAFC (32). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to HAFC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HAFC (30). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to HAFC’s over the last 12 months.

HAFC's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (62). This means that HAFC’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

HAFC's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (59). This means that HAFC’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFBCHAFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HAFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HLMOX9.07N/A
N/A
Harding Loevner Frontier Emerg Mkts Inv
MSBVX11.94N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley American Resilience I
NBMIX49.30N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Small Cap Growth Inv
RREMX15.49N/A
N/A
RBC Emerging Markets Equity R6
RAPRX10.91-0.01
-0.09%
Cohen & Steers Real Assets R

HAFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAFC has been closely correlated with TCBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAFC jumps, then TCBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAFC
1D Price
Change %
HAFC100%
+1.74%
TCBK - HAFC
84%
Closely correlated
+0.65%
NBTB - HAFC
82%
Closely correlated
+0.74%
TRMK - HAFC
81%
Closely correlated
+1.34%
FFBC - HAFC
80%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
NBHC - HAFC
79%
Closely correlated
+1.11%
More