FFBC
Price
$25.81
Change
-$0.15 (-0.58%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.44B
27 days until earnings call
LRCDF
Price
$24.13
Change
-$0.25 (-1.03%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
1.05B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFBC vs LRCDF

Header iconFFBC vs LRCDF Comparison
Open Charts FFBC vs LRCDFBanner chart's image
First Financial Ban
Price$25.81
Change-$0.15 (-0.58%)
Volume$404.65K
Capitalization2.44B
Laurentian Bank of Canada
Price$24.13
Change-$0.25 (-1.03%)
Volume$62.55K
Capitalization1.05B
FFBC vs LRCDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBC vs. LRCDF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBC is a Buy and LRCDF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FFBC: $25.81 vs. LRCDF: $24.13)
Brand notoriety: FFBC and LRCDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBC: 82% vs. LRCDF: 334%
Market capitalization -- FFBC: $2.44B vs. LRCDF: $1.05B
FFBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.44B. LRCDF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.05B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $164.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLRCDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LRCDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the long-term than LRCDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFBC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LRCDF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFBC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LRCDF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LRCDF is a better buy in the short-term than FFBC.

Price Growth

FFBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.09% price change this week, while LRCDF (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.65% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFBC($2.45B) has a higher market cap than LRCDF($1.05B). LRCDF has higher P/E ratio than FFBC: LRCDF (10.95) vs FFBC (10.32). LRCDF YTD gains are higher at: 20.831 vs. FFBC (-1.228). FFBC has less debt than LRCDF: FFBC (1.03B) vs LRCDF (15.6B). LRCDF has higher revenues than FFBC: LRCDF (975M) vs FFBC (852M).
FFBCLRCDFFFBC / LRCDF
Capitalization2.45B1.05B232%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.22820.831-6%
P/E Ratio10.3210.9594%
Revenue852M975M87%
Total Cash210MN/A-
Total Debt1.03B15.6B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBC vs LRCDF: Fundamental Ratings
FFBC
LRCDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7429
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2485
SMR RATING
1..100
1514
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5446
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4440
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LRCDF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as FFBC (45) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LRCDF’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LRCDF (85) in the null industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

LRCDF's SMR Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as FFBC (15) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LRCDF’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

LRCDF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as FFBC (54) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LRCDF’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

LRCDF's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as FFBC (44) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LRCDF’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFBCLRCDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
33%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PAWAX80.33N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price All-Cap Opportunities-Adv
KDHAX53.48N/A
N/A
DWS CROCI Equity Dividend A
ANDRX16.40N/A
N/A
AQR International Defensive Style R6
MRCEX12.70N/A
N/A
Meridian Hedged Equity C
TQCRX20.18N/A
N/A
Touchstone Dividend Equity R6

FFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBC has been closely correlated with TCBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFBC jumps, then TCBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBC
1D Price
Change %
FFBC100%
-0.58%
TCBK - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.53%
UBSI - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
EBC - FFBC
90%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
PFS - FFBC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
UCB - FFBC
90%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
More

LRCDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LRCDF and SFBS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LRCDF and SFBS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRCDF
1D Price
Change %
LRCDF100%
N/A
SFBS - LRCDF
28%
Poorly correlated
-1.13%
CATY - LRCDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
BANR - LRCDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.41%
KBCSY - LRCDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
FFBC - LRCDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
More