FFBC
Price
$24.86
Change
+$1.02 (+4.28%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.08B
89 days until earnings call
LRCDF
Price
$22.50
Change
-$0.34 (-1.49%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
1.3B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFBC vs LRCDF

Header iconFFBC vs LRCDF Comparison
Open Charts FFBC vs LRCDFBanner chart's image
First Financial Ban
Price$24.86
Change+$1.02 (+4.28%)
Volume$882.3K
Capitalization2.08B
Laurentian Bank of Canada
Price$22.50
Change-$0.34 (-1.49%)
Volume$500
Capitalization1.3B
FFBC vs LRCDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBC vs. LRCDF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBC is a Buy and LRCDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FFBC: $24.86 vs. LRCDF: $22.50)
Brand notoriety: FFBC and LRCDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBC: 239% vs. LRCDF: 73%
Market capitalization -- FFBC: $2.08B vs. LRCDF: $1.3B
FFBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.08B. LRCDF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileLRCDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LRCDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FFBC and LRCDF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFBC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LRCDF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFBC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LRCDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the short-term than LRCDF.

Price Growth

FFBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LRCDF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.50% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFBC($2.08B) has a higher market cap than LRCDF($1.3B). LRCDF (8.54) and FFBC (8.15) have similar P/E ratio . LRCDF YTD gains are higher at: 12.669 vs. FFBC (-5.762). FFBC has less debt than LRCDF: FFBC (1.28B) vs LRCDF (15.4B). LRCDF has higher revenues than FFBC: LRCDF (1.03B) vs FFBC (840M).
FFBCLRCDFFFBC / LRCDF
Capitalization2.08B1.3B160%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.76212.669-45%
P/E Ratio8.158.5495%
Revenue840M1.03B81%
Total Cash213MN/A-
Total Debt1.28B15.4B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBC vs LRCDF: Fundamental Ratings
FFBC
LRCDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6190
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
38
Fair valued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2493
SMR RATING
1..100
1212
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6757
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LRCDF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as FFBC (38) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LRCDF’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for LRCDF (93) in the null industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew significantly faster than LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LRCDF (12) in the null industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

LRCDF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as FFBC (60) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LRCDF’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

LRCDF's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as FFBC (67) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that LRCDF’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFBCLRCDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
64%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
33%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APHRX35.930.03
+0.08%
Artisan Global Opportunities Instl
GQETX34.23N/A
N/A
GMO Quality III
FICEX16.96N/A
N/A
Frost Growth Equity Inst
TINVX25.33N/A
N/A
Thornburg International Growth R4
JESSX17.84N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Global Sust Eq S

LRCDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LRCDF and SFBS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LRCDF and SFBS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRCDF
1D Price
Change %
LRCDF100%
N/A
SFBS - LRCDF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
CATY - LRCDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
BANR - LRCDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.51%
KBCSY - LRCDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
FFBC - LRCDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+4.28%
More