Ad is loading...
FFBC
Price
$29.10
Change
+$0.02 (+0.07%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
67 days until earnings call
OCFC
Price
$20.49
Change
+$0.03 (+0.15%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
67 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FFBC vs OCFC

Header iconFFBC vs OCFC Comparison
Open Charts FFBC vs OCFCBanner chart's image
First Financial Ban
Price$29.10
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
Volume$334.3K
CapitalizationN/A
OceanFirst Financial
Price$20.49
Change+$0.03 (+0.15%)
Volume$171.77K
CapitalizationN/A
FFBC vs OCFC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
OCFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBC vs. OCFC commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBC is a StrongSell and OCFC is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FFBC: $29.10 vs. OCFC: $20.49)
Brand notoriety: FFBC and OCFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBC: 76% vs. OCFC: 63%
Market capitalization -- FFBC: $2.08B vs. OCFC: $932.06M
FFBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.08B. OCFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $932.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOCFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OCFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the long-term than OCFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFBC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OCFC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFBC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • OCFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the short-term than OCFC.

Price Growth

FFBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.00% price change this week, while OCFC (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

OCFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFBC($2.08B) has a higher market cap than OCFC($932M). OCFC has higher P/E ratio than FFBC: OCFC (9.30) vs FFBC (8.15). FFBC YTD gains are higher at: 26.274 vs. OCFC (23.864). OCFC has less debt than FFBC: OCFC (974M) vs FFBC (1.28B). FFBC has higher revenues than OCFC: FFBC (840M) vs OCFC (399M).
FFBCOCFCFFBC / OCFC
Capitalization2.08B932M224%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD26.27423.864110%
P/E Ratio8.159.3088%
Revenue840M399M211%
Total Cash213MN/A-
Total Debt1.28B974M132%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBC vs OCFC: Fundamental Ratings
FFBC
OCFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7780
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3786
SMR RATING
1..100
1215
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4039
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1717
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OCFC's Valuation (35) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (61) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that OCFC’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for OCFC (86) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than OCFC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as OCFC (15) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to OCFC’s over the last 12 months.

OCFC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (40) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that OCFC’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

OCFC's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (17) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that OCFC’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFBCOCFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
OCFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PEQSX37.88-0.21
-0.55%
Putnam Large Cap Value R6
MRIMX27.40-0.21
-0.76%
Victory Integrity Mid-Cap Value R6
JHTRX19.50-0.17
-0.86%
JPMorgan Hedged Equity 3 R6
PEDGX13.59-0.16
-1.16%
Principal Edge MidCap Institutional
HGHIX41.02-1.13
-2.68%
Hartford Healthcare I

FFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFBC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBC
1D Price
Change %
FFBC100%
+0.07%
UBSI - FFBC
93%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
UCB - FFBC
92%
Closely correlated
+1.20%
CBU - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.63%
FRME - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
BUSE - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
More

OCFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OCFC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OCFC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCFC
1D Price
Change %
OCFC100%
+0.15%
UBSI - OCFC
89%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
NWBI - OCFC
89%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
FFBC - OCFC
89%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
FCF - OCFC
89%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
ABCB - OCFC
89%
Closely correlated
+0.01%
More