Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FIDAX
FFBFX vs FIDAX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FIDAX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$29.15
Change+$0.22 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.98M
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$19.14
Change-$0.13 (-0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets308.87M
FFBFX vs FIDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FIDAX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Buy and FIDAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 309M vs. FFBFX (52M). FFBFX pays higher dividends than FIDAX: FFBFX (2.01) vs FIDAX (1.08). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FIDAX: FFBFX (15 years) vs FIDAX (29 years). FFBFX (1.82) is less costly to investors than FIDAX (1.28). FIDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFBFX (56.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FIDAX (1000) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.10 vs. FIDAX (17.00). FFBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.51 vs. FIDAX (32.47).
| FFBFX | FIDAX | FFBFX / FIDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.27 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.28 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.459 | 6.700 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52M | 309M | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 1.08 | 186% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.10 | 17.00 | 230% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.89 | 24.18 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.51 | 32.47 | 134% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.56 | 14.55 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement