Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FIDAX
FFBFX vs FIDAX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FIDAX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$26.69
Change+$0.56 (+2.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.86M
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$18.80
Change+$0.24 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.13M
FFBFX vs FIDAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FIDAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Buy and FIDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 299M vs. FFBFX (46.9M). FFBFX pays higher dividends than FIDAX: FFBFX (2.11) vs FIDAX (1.11). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FIDAX: FFBFX (15 years) vs FIDAX (29 years). FFBFX (1.82) is less costly to investors than FIDAX (1.28). FIDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFBFX (56.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FIDAX (1000) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.85 vs. FIDAX (13.79). FIDAX return over 5 years is better than : 15.00 vs. FFBFX (13.85).
| FFBFX | FIDAX | FFBFX / FIDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.27 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.28 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.135 | 2.769 | -41% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.9M | 299M | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.11 | 1.11 | 191% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.85 | 13.79 | 202% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.17 | 8.97 | -35% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.85 | 15.00 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.69 | 10.09 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement