Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FIDAX
FFBFX vs FIDAX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FIDAX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$30.00
Change+$0.11 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets50.5M
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$19.13
Change+$0.17 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets298.36M
FFBFX vs FIDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FIDAX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Buy and FIDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 298M vs. FFBFX (50.5M). FIDAX pays higher dividends than FFBFX: FIDAX (1.08) vs FFBFX (0.00). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FIDAX: FFBFX (16 years) vs FIDAX (30 years). FFBFX (1.82) is less costly to investors than FIDAX (1.28). FIDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFBFX (32.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FIDAX (1000) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.65 vs. FIDAX (6.62). FFBFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.34 vs. FIDAX (23.26).
| FFBFX | FIDAX | FFBFX / FIDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.27 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.28 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.507 | 5.925 | 228% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 50.5M | 298M | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.08 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.65 | 6.62 | 342% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.17 | 19.46 | 165% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.34 | 23.26 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.77 | 22.46 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement