Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FIDAX
FFBFX vs FIDAX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FIDAX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$27.11
Change-$0.03 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.14M
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$18.37
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets281.83M
FFBFX vs FIDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FIDAX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Hold and FIDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 282M vs. FFBFX (45.1M). FIDAX pays higher dividends than FFBFX: FIDAX (1.11) vs FFBFX (0.00). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FIDAX: FFBFX (16 years) vs FIDAX (30 years). FFBFX (1.89) is less costly to investors than FIDAX (1.28). FIDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFBFX (32.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FIDAX (1000) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.51 vs. FIDAX (-9.97). FIDAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.05 vs. FFBFX (2.02).
| FFBFX | FIDAX | FFBFX / FIDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.27 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.89 | 1.28 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.686 | 1.717 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 45.1M | 282M | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.11 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.51 | -9.97 | 25% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.80 | 9.22 | 301% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.02 | 4.05 | 50% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.31 | 12.28 | -43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers