Ad is loading...
FFBFX vs FIDAX
FFBFX vs FIDAX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FIDAX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$24.22
Change+$1.52 (+6.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.9M
JHancock Financial Industries A
Price$16.89
Change+$1.18 (+7.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets257.07M
FFBFX vs FIDAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FIDAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Buy and FIDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDAX has more cash in the bank: 257M vs. FFBFX (41.9M). FFBFX pays higher dividends than FIDAX: FFBFX (2.17) vs FIDAX (1.14). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FIDAX: FFBFX (15 years) vs FIDAX (29 years). FFBFX (1.82) is less costly to investors than FIDAX (1.28). FIDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFBFX (56.00). FIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FIDAX (1000) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.60 vs. FIDAX (-3.80). FFBFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.44 vs. FIDAX (11.80).
| FFBFX | FIDAX | FFBFX / FIDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.27 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.28 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.113 | -13.012 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.9M | 257M | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.17 | 1.14 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.60 | -3.80 | -173% |
| Returns for 3 years | -31.71 | -11.31 | 280% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.44 | 11.80 | 173% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.43 | -3.87 | 218% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...