Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FIDCX
FFBFX vs FIDCX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FIDCX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$29.15
Change+$0.22 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.98M
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.91
Change-$0.12 (-0.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets308.87M
FFBFX vs FIDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FIDCX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Buy and FIDCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 309M vs. FFBFX (52M). FFBFX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: FFBFX (2.01) vs FIDCX (0.52). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FIDCX: FFBFX (15 years) vs FIDCX (26 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than FFBFX (1.82). FIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFBFX (56.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FIDCX (1000) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.10 vs. FIDCX (14.31). FFBFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.51 vs. FIDCX (21.25).
| FFBFX | FIDCX | FFBFX / FIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.97 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.98 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.459 | 6.300 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52M | 309M | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 0.52 | 389% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.10 | 14.31 | 273% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.89 | 18.47 | 140% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.51 | 21.25 | 205% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.56 | -0.29 | -2,609% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement