Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FIDCX
FFBFX vs FIDCX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FIDCX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$26.69
Change+$0.56 (+2.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets46.86M
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.64
Change+$0.20 (+1.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.13M
FFBFX vs FIDCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FIDCX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Buy and FIDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 299M vs. FFBFX (46.9M). FFBFX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: FFBFX (2.11) vs FIDCX (0.53). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FIDCX: FFBFX (15 years) vs FIDCX (26 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than FFBFX (1.82). FIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFBFX (56.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FIDCX (1000) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 27.85 vs. FIDCX (11.13). FFBFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.85 vs. FIDCX (5.22).
| FFBFX | FIDCX | FFBFX / FIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.97 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.98 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.135 | 2.387 | -48% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 46.9M | 299M | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.11 | 0.53 | 400% |
| Returns for 1 year | 27.85 | 11.13 | 250% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.17 | 3.86 | -82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.85 | 5.22 | 265% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.69 | -4.25 | -16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers