Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FIDCX
FFBFX vs FIDCX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FIDCX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$29.21
Change-$0.35 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.94M
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.71
Change-$0.17 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets298.08M
FFBFX vs FIDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FIDCX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Buy and FIDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 298M vs. FFBFX (49.9M). FIDCX pays higher dividends than FFBFX: FIDCX (0.52) vs FFBFX (0.00). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FIDCX: FFBFX (15 years) vs FIDCX (26 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than FFBFX (1.82). FIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFBFX (32.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FIDCX (1000) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.67 vs. FIDCX (7.10). FFBFX return over 5 years is better than : 25.41 vs. FIDCX (8.06).
| FFBFX | FIDCX | FFBFX / FIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.97 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.98 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.518 | 4.178 | 252% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.9M | 298M | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.52 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.67 | 7.10 | 334% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.24 | 4.10 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.41 | 8.06 | 315% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.52 | -2.80 | -233% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement