Ad is loading...
FFBFX vs FIDCX
FFBFX vs FIDCX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FIDCX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$24.22
Change+$1.52 (+6.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.9M
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$14.07
Change+$0.98 (+7.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets257.07M
FFBFX vs FIDCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FIDCX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Buy and FIDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 257M vs. FFBFX (41.9M). FFBFX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: FFBFX (2.17) vs FIDCX (0.54). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FIDCX: FFBFX (15 years) vs FIDCX (26 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than FFBFX (1.82). FIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFBFX (56.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FIDCX (1000) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.60 vs. FIDCX (-6.05). FFBFX return over 5 years is better than : 20.44 vs. FIDCX (2.39).
| FFBFX | FIDCX | FFBFX / FIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.97 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.98 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.113 | -13.196 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.9M | 257M | 16% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.17 | 0.54 | 399% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.60 | -6.05 | -109% |
| Returns for 3 years | -31.71 | -15.41 | 206% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.44 | 2.39 | 855% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.43 | -16.33 | 52% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...