Ad is loading...
FFBFX vs FIDCX
FFBFX vs FIDCX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FIDCX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$24.51
Change-$0.87 (-3.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.36M
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$14.36
Change-$0.49 (-3.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets372.72M
FFBFX vs FIDCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FIDCX commentary
Mar 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Hold and FIDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 373M vs. FFBFX (47.4M). FFBFX pays higher dividends than FIDCX: FFBFX (2.06) vs FIDCX (0.52). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FIDCX: FFBFX (15 years) vs FIDCX (26 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than FFBFX (1.82). FIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFBFX (56.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FIDCX (1000) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.25 vs. FIDCX (7.66). FFBFX (17.43) and FIDCX (16.60) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FFBFX | FIDCX | FFBFX / FIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.97 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.98 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.973 | -1.525 | 260% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 47.4M | 373M | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.06 | 0.52 | 397% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.25 | 7.66 | 225% |
| Returns for 3 years | -27.41 | -3.36 | 816% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.43 | 16.60 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.76 | -4.62 | -81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...