Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FIDCX
FFBFX vs FIDCX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FIDCX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$30.91
Change+$0.43 (+1.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets52.19M
JHancock Financial Industries C
Price$15.88
Change-$0.25 (-1.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets304.71M
FFBFX vs FIDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FIDCX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Buy and FIDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDCX has more cash in the bank: 305M vs. FFBFX (52.2M). FIDCX pays higher dividends than FFBFX: FIDCX (0.51) vs FFBFX (0.00). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FIDCX: FFBFX (15 years) vs FIDCX (27 years). FIDCX (1.98) is less costly to investors than FFBFX (1.82). FIDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFBFX (32.00). FIDCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FIDCX (1000) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.94 vs. FIDCX (7.06). FFBFX return over 5 years is better than : 34.36 vs. FIDCX (12.29).
| FFBFX | FIDCX | FFBFX / FIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.97 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 1.98 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.950 | 6.963 | 243% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52.2M | 305M | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.51 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 26.94 | 7.06 | 382% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.28 | 16.50 | 208% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.36 | 12.29 | 280% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.26 | 6.90 | 250% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement